From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic:
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:54:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100601125427.GA5198@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFA2539.3030709@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:05:38PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2010/06/01 19:55), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >>>Sorry but I have to say that mmu_lock spin_lock problem was completely
> >>>out of
> >>>my mind. Although I looked through the code, it seems not easy to move the
> >>>set_bit_user to outside of spinlock section without breaking the
> >>>semantics of
> >>>its protection.
> >>>
> >>>So this may take some time to solve.
> >>>
> >>>But personally, I want to do something for x86's "vmallc() every time"
> >>>problem
> >>>even though moving dirty bitmaps to user space cannot be achieved soon.
> >>>
> >>>In that sense, do you mind if we do double buffering without moving
> >>>dirty bitmaps to
> >>>user space?
> >>
> >>So I would be happy if you give me any comments about this kind of other
> >>options.
> >
> >What if you pin the bitmaps?
>
> Yes, pinning bitmaps works. The small problem is that we need to hold
> the dirty_bitmap_pages[] array for every slot, the size of this array
> depends on the slot length, and of course pinning itself.
>
> In the performance point of view, having double sized vmalloc'ed
> area may be better.
>
> >
> >The alternative to that is to move mark_page_dirty(gfn) before acquision
> >of mmu_lock, in the page fault paths. The downside of that is a
> >potentially (large?) number of false positives in the dirty bitmap.
> >
>
> Interesting, but probably dangerous.
>
>
> From my experience, though this includes my personal view, removing vmalloc
> currently used by x86 is the most simple and effective change.
>
> So if you don't mind, I want to double the size of vmalloc'ed area for x86
> without changing other parts.
>
> => if this one more bitmap is problematic, dirty logging itself would be
> in danger of failure: we need to have the same size in the timing of
> switch.
>
> Make sense?
That seems the most sensible approach.
>
> We can consider moving dirty bitmaps to user space later.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>,
agraf@suse.de, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic:
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:54:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100601125427.GA5198@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C04F792.10207@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:05:38PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2010/06/01 19:55), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >>>Sorry but I have to say that mmu_lock spin_lock problem was completely
> >>>out of
> >>>my mind. Although I looked through the code, it seems not easy to move the
> >>>set_bit_user to outside of spinlock section without breaking the
> >>>semantics of
> >>>its protection.
> >>>
> >>>So this may take some time to solve.
> >>>
> >>>But personally, I want to do something for x86's "vmallc() every time"
> >>>problem
> >>>even though moving dirty bitmaps to user space cannot be achieved soon.
> >>>
> >>>In that sense, do you mind if we do double buffering without moving
> >>>dirty bitmaps to
> >>>user space?
> >>
> >>So I would be happy if you give me any comments about this kind of other
> >>options.
> >
> >What if you pin the bitmaps?
>
> Yes, pinning bitmaps works. The small problem is that we need to hold
> the dirty_bitmap_pages[] array for every slot, the size of this array
> depends on the slot length, and of course pinning itself.
>
> In the performance point of view, having double sized vmalloc'ed
> area may be better.
>
> >
> >The alternative to that is to move mark_page_dirty(gfn) before acquision
> >of mmu_lock, in the page fault paths. The downside of that is a
> >potentially (large?) number of false positives in the dirty bitmap.
> >
>
> Interesting, but probably dangerous.
>
>
> From my experience, though this includes my personal view, removing vmalloc
> currently used by x86 is the most simple and effective change.
>
> So if you don't mind, I want to double the size of vmalloc'ed area for x86
> without changing other parts.
>
> => if this one more bitmap is problematic, dirty logging itself would be
> in danger of failure: we need to have the same size in the timing of
> switch.
>
> Make sense?
That seems the most sensible approach.
>
> We can consider moving dirty bitmaps to user space later.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>,
agraf@suse.de, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:54:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100601125427.GA5198@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C04F792.10207@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:05:38PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2010/06/01 19:55), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >>>Sorry but I have to say that mmu_lock spin_lock problem was completely
> >>>out of
> >>>my mind. Although I looked through the code, it seems not easy to move the
> >>>set_bit_user to outside of spinlock section without breaking the
> >>>semantics of
> >>>its protection.
> >>>
> >>>So this may take some time to solve.
> >>>
> >>>But personally, I want to do something for x86's "vmallc() every time"
> >>>problem
> >>>even though moving dirty bitmaps to user space cannot be achieved soon.
> >>>
> >>>In that sense, do you mind if we do double buffering without moving
> >>>dirty bitmaps to
> >>>user space?
> >>
> >>So I would be happy if you give me any comments about this kind of other
> >>options.
> >
> >What if you pin the bitmaps?
>
> Yes, pinning bitmaps works. The small problem is that we need to hold
> the dirty_bitmap_pages[] array for every slot, the size of this array
> depends on the slot length, and of course pinning itself.
>
> In the performance point of view, having double sized vmalloc'ed
> area may be better.
>
> >
> >The alternative to that is to move mark_page_dirty(gfn) before acquision
> >of mmu_lock, in the page fault paths. The downside of that is a
> >potentially (large?) number of false positives in the dirty bitmap.
> >
>
> Interesting, but probably dangerous.
>
>
> From my experience, though this includes my personal view, removing vmalloc
> currently used by x86 is the most simple and effective change.
>
> So if you don't mind, I want to double the size of vmalloc'ed area for x86
> without changing other parts.
>
> ==> if this one more bitmap is problematic, dirty logging itself would be
> in danger of failure: we need to have the same size in the timing of
> switch.
>
> Make sense?
That seems the most sensible approach.
>
> We can consider moving dirty bitmaps to user space later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-01 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 175+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-24 7:05 Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-24 7:05 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-24 7:05 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-01 10:55 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-01 10:55 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-01 10:55 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-01 12:05 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-01 12:05 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-01 12:05 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-06-01 12:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-06-01 12:54 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-01 12:54 ` Any comments? Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: Marcelo Tosatti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-04 13:11 [RFC][PATCH 12/12 sample] qemu-kvm: use new API for Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/12 sample] qemu-kvm: use new API for getting/switching dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:11 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/12 sample] qemu-kvm: use new API for Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:08 [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:08 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 3:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching dirty bitmaps Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 5:53 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 5:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 5:53 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 5:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 14:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 14:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching dirty bitmaps Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 14:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 14:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 14:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-12 5:59 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 6:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 6:03 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 6:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] KVM: introduce new API for getting/switching Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:07 [RFC][PATCH RFC 10/12] KVM: move dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 3:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-11 3:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-12 6:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 6:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 6:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 6:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-13 11:05 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-13 11:05 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-13 11:05 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:06 [RFC][PATCH 9/12] KVM: introduce a wrapper function of Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/12] KVM: introduce a wrapper function of set_bit_user_non_atomic() Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:06 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:06 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/12] KVM: introduce a wrapper function of Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:05 [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:05 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:05 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:05 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 15:03 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 15:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 15:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 15:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 16:08 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Avi Kivity
2010-05-04 16:08 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Avi Kivity
2010-05-04 16:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-04 16:08 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Avi Kivity
2010-05-05 2:59 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-05 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-05 2:59 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-05 2:59 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-05 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-06 13:38 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-06 13:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-06 13:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-06 13:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-06 13:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-10 11:46 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 11:46 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 11:46 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 11:46 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 11:46 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:01 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:01 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:01 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:01 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:01 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-10 12:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-10 12:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-10 12:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-10 12:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-10 12:09 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:09 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:09 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:09 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:09 ` [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:04 [RFC][PATCH 7/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce __set_bit() like Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce __set_bit() like function for bitmaps in user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:04 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:04 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce __set_bit() like Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 16:00 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 16:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce __set_bit() like function for bitmaps in user space Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 16:00 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 16:00 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 16:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce __set_bit() like Alexander Graf
2010-05-12 9:25 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 9:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce __set_bit() like function for bitmaps in user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 9:25 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 9:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce __set_bit() like Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:03 [RFC][PATCH 6/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce copy_in_user() for Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce copy_in_user() for 32-bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:03 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/12 not tested yet] PPC: introduce copy_in_user() for Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 [RFC][PATCH 5/12] x86: introduce __set_bit() like function for Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/12] x86: introduce __set_bit() like function for bitmaps in user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/12] x86: introduce __set_bit() like function for Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 [RFC][PATCH 4/12] x86: introduce copy_in_user() for 32-bit Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:02 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:01 [RFC][PATCH 3/12] KVM: introduce wrapper functions to create and Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/12] KVM: introduce wrapper functions to create and destroy dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/12] KVM: introduce wrapper functions to create and Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:00 [RFC][PATCH 2/12] KVM: introduce slot level dirty state management Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:00 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:00 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:00 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 13:00 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:58 [RFC][PATCH 1/12 applied today] KVM: x86: avoid unnecessary bitmap Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/12 applied today] KVM: x86: avoid unnecessary bitmap allocation when memslot is clean Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:58 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/12 applied today] KVM: x86: avoid unnecessary bitmap Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04 12:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 12:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:26 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-10 12:26 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 10:11 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 10:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 10:11 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 10:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-11 15:55 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 15:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 15:55 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 15:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Alexander Graf
2010-05-12 9:19 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 9:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 9:19 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-12 9:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-13 11:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-13 11:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Avi Kivity
2010-05-13 11:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-13 11:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Avi Kivity
2010-05-17 9:06 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-17 9:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-17 9:06 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-17 9:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100601125427.GA5198@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.