All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] oom: dump_tasks() use find_lock_task_mm() too
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:21:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100603152143.GA8005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100603152350.725F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On 06/03, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> dump_task() should use find_lock_task_mm() too. It is necessary for
> protecting task-exiting race.

This patch also replaces the pointless do_each_thread() with
for_each_process(), good.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 35a2ecc..6360c56 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -345,35 +345,38 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
>   */
>  static void dump_tasks(const struct mem_cgroup *mem)
>  {
> -	struct task_struct *g, *p;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
> +	struct task_struct *task;
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "[ pid ]   uid  tgid total_vm      rss cpu oom_adj "
>  	       "name\n");
> -	do_each_thread(g, p) {
> -		struct mm_struct *mm;
>  
> -		if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
> +	for_each_process(p) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We don't have is_global_init() check here, because the old
> +		 * code do that. printing init process is not big matter. But 
> +		 * we don't hope to make unnecessary compatiblity breaking.
> +		 */
> +		if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
>  			continue;
> -		if (!thread_group_leader(p))
> +		if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		task_lock(p);
> -		mm = p->mm;
> -		if (!mm) {
> +		task = find_lock_task_mm(p);
> +		if (!task)
>  			/*
> -			 * total_vm and rss sizes do not exist for tasks with no
> -			 * mm so there's no need to report them; they can't be
> -			 * oom killed anyway.
> +			 * Probably oom vs task-exiting race was happen and ->mm
> +			 * have been detached. thus there's no need to report them;
> +			 * they can't be oom killed anyway.
>  			 */
> -			task_unlock(p);
>  			continue;
> -		}
> +
>  		printk(KERN_INFO "[%5d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %3d     %3d %s\n",
> -		       p->pid, __task_cred(p)->uid, p->tgid, mm->total_vm,
> -		       get_mm_rss(mm), (int)task_cpu(p), p->signal->oom_adj,
> +		       task->pid, __task_cred(task)->uid, task->tgid, task->mm->total_vm,
> +		       get_mm_rss(task->mm), (int)task_cpu(task), task->signal->oom_adj,
>  		       p->comm);
> -		task_unlock(p);
> -	} while_each_thread(g, p);
> +		task_unlock(task);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] oom: dump_tasks() use find_lock_task_mm() too
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:21:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100603152143.GA8005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100603152350.725F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On 06/03, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> dump_task() should use find_lock_task_mm() too. It is necessary for
> protecting task-exiting race.

This patch also replaces the pointless do_each_thread() with
for_each_process(), good.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 35a2ecc..6360c56 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -345,35 +345,38 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
>   */
>  static void dump_tasks(const struct mem_cgroup *mem)
>  {
> -	struct task_struct *g, *p;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
> +	struct task_struct *task;
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "[ pid ]   uid  tgid total_vm      rss cpu oom_adj "
>  	       "name\n");
> -	do_each_thread(g, p) {
> -		struct mm_struct *mm;
>  
> -		if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
> +	for_each_process(p) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We don't have is_global_init() check here, because the old
> +		 * code do that. printing init process is not big matter. But 
> +		 * we don't hope to make unnecessary compatiblity breaking.
> +		 */
> +		if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
>  			continue;
> -		if (!thread_group_leader(p))
> +		if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		task_lock(p);
> -		mm = p->mm;
> -		if (!mm) {
> +		task = find_lock_task_mm(p);
> +		if (!task)
>  			/*
> -			 * total_vm and rss sizes do not exist for tasks with no
> -			 * mm so there's no need to report them; they can't be
> -			 * oom killed anyway.
> +			 * Probably oom vs task-exiting race was happen and ->mm
> +			 * have been detached. thus there's no need to report them;
> +			 * they can't be oom killed anyway.
>  			 */
> -			task_unlock(p);
>  			continue;
> -		}
> +
>  		printk(KERN_INFO "[%5d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %3d     %3d %s\n",
> -		       p->pid, __task_cred(p)->uid, p->tgid, mm->total_vm,
> -		       get_mm_rss(mm), (int)task_cpu(p), p->signal->oom_adj,
> +		       task->pid, __task_cred(task)->uid, task->tgid, task->mm->total_vm,
> +		       get_mm_rss(task->mm), (int)task_cpu(task), task->signal->oom_adj,
>  		       p->comm);
> -		task_unlock(p);
> -	} while_each_thread(g, p);
> +		task_unlock(task);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-03 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-03  5:48 [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:49   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:50   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:12   ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  6:12     ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  6:52     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:52       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] oom: the points calculation of child processes must use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:51   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:20   ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  6:20     ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  5:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] oom: __oom_kill_task() " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:52   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:53 ` [PATCH 05/12] oom: make oom_unkillable() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  5:53   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:11 ` [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  6:11   ` Minchan Kim
2010-06-03  6:23 ` [PATCH 06/12] oom: remove warning for in mm-less task __oom_kill_process() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:23   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:31   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:31     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:37   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03  6:37     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03  6:23 ` [PATCH 07/12] oom: Fix child process iteration properly KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:23   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:33   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:33     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:24 ` [PATCH 08/12] oom: dump_tasks() use find_lock_task_mm() too KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:24   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:34   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:34     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03 15:21   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-06-03 15:21     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 15:26   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 15:26     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 20:12     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 20:12       ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 22:01       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 22:01         ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 23:18         ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 23:18           ` David Rientjes
2010-06-04 10:54     ` [PATCH 13/12] oom: dump_header() need tasklist_lock KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-04 10:54       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] oom: remove PF_EXITING check completely KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:25   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:34   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03  6:34     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 14:00     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 14:00       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 20:26       ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 20:26         ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 22:11         ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 22:11           ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-03 23:23           ` David Rientjes
2010-06-03 23:23             ` David Rientjes
2010-06-04 10:04             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-04 10:04               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-04 10:54     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-04 10:54       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:36   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:36     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-03  6:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:26   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] oom: remove special handling for pagefault ooms KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:26   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:27 ` [PATCH 12/12] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-03  6:27   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 18:26     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-08 18:26       ` David Rientjes
2010-06-08 11:41 ` [mmotm 0521][PATCH 0/12] various OOM fixes for 2.6.35 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-06-08 11:41   ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100603152143.GA8005@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lclaudio@uudg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.