From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"TuxOnIce-devel" <tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image.
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:41:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006071041.49159.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim9CNFMMVQaghrzK3JnQlGmTewgarT01HP6cEtd@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday 06 June 2010, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 20:04, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
...
> > So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB
> > (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)? Would it
> > be _that_ _much_ worse?
>
> No it wouldn't be much worse. But there will still be some lagginess,
> some delay, some sort of annoying disk activity compared to NO delay,
> NO lagginess, in short, you have your computer _exactly_ the way you
> left it when you left it when you hibernated. And the difference is
> noticeable.
Well, have you actually tried that?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-07 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 14:50 [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image Pavel Machek
2010-06-04 23:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-04 23:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:36 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 0:36 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 0:45 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 3:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 3:37 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:45 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 0:47 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 1:16 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 1:16 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 3:17 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 3:17 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:47 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-04 23:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-04 23:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 0:05 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 12:59 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Theodore Tso
2010-06-05 12:59 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] " Theodore Tso
2010-06-05 23:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 23:01 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:20 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 18:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 18:45 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 19:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 19:21 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 22:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 7:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-06 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 5:23 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 5:23 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 8:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 8:40 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 7:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 22:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-06 0:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 0:40 ` [linux-pm] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 15:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 19:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 19:51 ` [linux-pm] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 21:55 ` Pedro Ribeiro
2010-06-07 8:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-06-07 8:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 21:55 ` Pedro Ribeiro
2010-06-07 5:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 5:31 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-08 2:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-08 2:07 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-08 9:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-08 9:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 13:07 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] [linux-pm] " Martin Steigerwald
2010-06-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 21:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 21:31 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 13:07 ` Martin Steigerwald
2010-06-06 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 15:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-07 5:28 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 5:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-06 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 19:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 0:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006071041.49159.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=pedrib@gmail.com \
--cc=tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.