From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, david@fromorbit.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:42:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610124231.GE10827@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100609164533.9d5c34dd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed 09-06-10 16:45:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 20:40:54 +0200
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > -#define RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS 2
> > +#define RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS 3
>
> Adds another eight bytes to the radix_tree_node, I think. What effect
> does this have upon the radix_tree_node_cachep packing for sl[aeiou]b?
> Please add to changelog if you can work it out ;).
The sizes of structure are:
32-bit: 288 vs 296
64-bit: 552 vs 560
I have now checked (running different kernels because I wasn't sure the
computations I do are right) and that gives 7 objects per page with SLAB
and SLUB on a 64-bit kernel. I'll try to get also SLOB numbers for 64-bit
and possibly numbers for 32-bit archs (although it gets a bit tiring to try
all the kernels ;).
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 18:40 [PATCH 0/2 RFC v3] Livelock avoidance for data integrity writeback Jan Kara
2010-06-04 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] radix-tree: Implement function radix_tree_gang_tag_if_tagged Jan Kara
2010-06-09 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-10 12:28 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-04 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging Jan Kara
2010-06-09 23:41 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-10 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-10 12:42 ` Jan Kara [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-04 18:47 [PATCH 0/2 RFC v3] Livelock avoidance for data integrity writeback Jan Kara
2010-06-04 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging Jan Kara
2010-06-05 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-07 16:09 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-08 5:29 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-09 13:04 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-10 8:12 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-12 18:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-12 22:28 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-13 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-16 16:33 (unknown), Jan Kara
2010-06-16 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using page tagging Jan Kara
2010-06-18 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-21 12:42 ` Jan Kara
[not found] <1277387867-5525-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
2010-06-24 13:57 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100610124231.GE10827@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.