All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilad Arnold <arnold@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: Drew <drew.kay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: migrating from RAID5 to RAID10
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:26:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610222625.GA14165@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim3vrtAfgzY87IAmP6mY9PNiYiQZ1LyuqWHisiD@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:11:43PM -0700, Drew wrote:
> Actually No. If it is RAID-5 as you claim, then currently it is
> effectively a RAID-0.
> 
> RAID-5 is Striping with Distributed Parity and requires a *minimum* of
> 3 disks. Two disks, regardless of how you got there, is considered
> a degraded state.

Sounds to me that you can still stripe and distribute parity with two
drives, only that parity will amount to mirroring, and it can still
tolerate a single drive failure. I got there in the usual way, creating
a RAID5 with --raid-devices=2.


--8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<----

$ mdadm --detail /dev/md4
/dev/md4:
        Version : 0.90
  Creation Time : Thu Nov 27 15:48:58 2008
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 484391808 (461.95 GiB 496.02 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 484391808 (461.95 GiB 496.02 GB)
   Raid Devices : 2
  Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 4
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Thu Jun 10 15:16:45 2010
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 64K

           UUID : 1da37f10:3c14071d:40784aba:8675d418
         Events : 0.94324

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       8        4        0      active sync   /dev/sda4
       1       8       20        1      active sync   /dev/sdb4

--8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<----


Gilad

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-10 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-09 15:11 migrating from RAID5 to RAID10 Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 18:52 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-10 19:58   ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 22:11     ` Drew
2010-06-10 22:21       ` Drew
2010-06-10 22:30         ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 22:26       ` Gilad Arnold [this message]
2010-06-16 15:54     ` Bill Davidsen
2010-06-16 18:30       ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-16 20:15         ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-17  1:59           ` Bill Davidsen
2010-06-16 21:26       ` Neil Brown
2010-06-17 17:44         ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-17 22:30           ` Neil Brown
2010-06-18  8:40             ` Keld Simonsen
2010-06-21 22:09               ` Neil Brown
2010-06-17 22:46           ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-18  2:39             ` Neil Brown
2010-06-18  4:01               ` Gilad Arnold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100610222625.GA14165@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU \
    --to=arnold@cs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=drew.kay@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.