All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilad Arnold <arnold@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: migrating from RAID5 to RAID10
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:46:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100617224657.GD8450@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100617174445.GB8450@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU>

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:44:45AM -0700, Gilad Arnold wrote:
> This leads me to think that even with 2 drives, RAID10/f2 is a better
> choice than RAID1. Is this a fair assessment?

Okay, I found the benchmarks that support this hypothesis ;-)

> And, if it is the case, can RAID5 be converted to RAID10/f2
> on-the-fly, or would I have to take the longer path?  (i.e. degrade
> RAID5, start RAID10 in degraded mode, copy data, kill RAID5 and
> rebuild RAID10)

Some more reading leads me to think that on-the-fly RAID5 to RAID10/f2
conversion wouldn't work.  However, I'm tempted to believe that I can
avoid the data copy phase entirely and skip straight to RAID10 rebuild:

1. Shutdown the RAID5.

2. Create a RAID10/f2 on top of one drive + missing, ignoring mdadm's
   warnings about an existing array. If I'm not terribly wrong, this
   will give me a degraded RAID10 that still has all my data in place.

3. Add the second drive to the RAID10 and watch it rebuild.


Apologies for my petty questions ;-)  Advice appreciated.

Gilad

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-17 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-09 15:11 migrating from RAID5 to RAID10 Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 18:52 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-10 19:58   ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 22:11     ` Drew
2010-06-10 22:21       ` Drew
2010-06-10 22:30         ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-10 22:26       ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-16 15:54     ` Bill Davidsen
2010-06-16 18:30       ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-16 20:15         ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-17  1:59           ` Bill Davidsen
2010-06-16 21:26       ` Neil Brown
2010-06-17 17:44         ` Gilad Arnold
2010-06-17 22:30           ` Neil Brown
2010-06-18  8:40             ` Keld Simonsen
2010-06-21 22:09               ` Neil Brown
2010-06-17 22:46           ` Gilad Arnold [this message]
2010-06-18  2:39             ` Neil Brown
2010-06-18  4:01               ` Gilad Arnold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100617224657.GD8450@libra.CS.Berkeley.EDU \
    --to=arnold@cs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=roman@rm.pp.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.