All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:34:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614093459.GD12159@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19477.53673.644128.558827@ipc1.ka-ro>

Hello,

> And arch/arm/plat-s3c/clock.c has the following comment:
> |/* We originally used an mutex here, but some contexts (see resume)
> | * are calling functions such as clk_set_parent() with IRQs disabled
> | * causing an BUG to be triggered.
> | */
> |DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clocks_lock);
I wonder why it's needed to reparent clocks during resume.  And where
exactly IRQs are disabled.  Hmm, this comment was initially introduced
by v2.6.28-rc7-180-gc3391e3, its commit log talks about cpufreq, not
resume.

Ben (Dooks): Is this still relevant?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:34:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614093459.GD12159@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19477.53673.644128.558827@ipc1.ka-ro>

Hello,

> And arch/arm/plat-s3c/clock.c has the following comment:
> |/* We originally used an mutex here, but some contexts (see resume)
> | * are calling functions such as clk_set_parent() with IRQs disabled
> | * causing an BUG to be triggered.
> | */
> |DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clocks_lock);
I wonder why it's needed to reparent clocks during resume.  And where
exactly IRQs are disabled.  Hmm, this comment was initially introduced
by v2.6.28-rc7-180-gc3391e3, its commit log talks about cpufreq, not
resume.

Ben (Dooks): Is this still relevant?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-14  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-04  7:30 [RFC,PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v4 Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  7:30 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  7:30 ` [RFC,PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  7:30   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-11  4:20   ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-11  4:20     ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-11  6:50     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-11  6:50       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-11  7:57     ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-11  7:57       ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-11  8:14       ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-11  8:14         ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-11  9:18         ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-11  9:18           ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-11  9:23           ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-11  9:23             ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-11  9:58             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-11  9:58               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-11 10:08               ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-11 10:08                 ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-11 10:50                 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-11 10:50                   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-12  5:14                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-12  5:14                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-14  6:39                   ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-14  6:39                     ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-14  6:40                     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-14  6:40                       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-14  6:52                       ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-14  6:52                         ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-14  9:34                         ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-06-14  9:34                           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-16 21:14                           ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-16 21:14                             ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-16 21:13                         ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-16 21:13                           ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-14  9:22                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-14  9:22                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-14  9:30                       ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-14  9:30                         ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-06-14  9:43                         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-14  9:43                           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-16 21:16                           ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-16 21:16                             ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-16 23:33                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-16 23:33                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-13 22:27                 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-13 22:27                   ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-11 14:11               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-11 14:11                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-12  5:12             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-12  5:12               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-12  5:10         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-12  5:10           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-13 22:25         ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-13 22:25           ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-13 22:23       ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-13 22:23         ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-14  3:10         ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-14  3:10           ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-10  2:10         ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-10  2:10           ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-14 10:18     ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-14 10:18       ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  7:30 ` [RFC,PATCH 2/2] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  7:30   ` Jeremy Kerr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-02 11:56 [RFC,PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v3 Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-02 11:56 ` [RFC,PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-02 11:56   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-02 12:03   ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-02 12:03     ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03  3:21     ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03  3:21       ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03  8:13       ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03  8:13         ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03 10:24         ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03 10:24           ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03 11:05           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 11:05             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-04  0:06             ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-04  0:06               ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-04  1:43               ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  1:43                 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  1:40             ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04  1:40               ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03 21:09         ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-03 21:09           ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-03 23:45           ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03 23:45             ` Ben Dooks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100614093459.GD12159@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.