From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>,
sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Make fiemap works with sparse file.
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:29:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614122912.GD6590@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100614002705.GA6590@dastard>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:27:06AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:08:15AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> > The reason is that in xfs_getbmap we will
> > calculate holes and set it in 'out', while out is malloced by
> > bmv_count(fi_extent_max+1) which didn't consider holes. So in the
> > worst case, if 'out' vector looks like
> > [hole, extent, hole, extent, hole, ... hole, extent, hole],
> > we will only return half of fi_extent_max extents.
>
> Right, it's not broken, we simply return less than fi_extent_mex
> extents when there are holes. I don't see that as a problem as
> applications have to handle that case anyway, and....
>
> > So in xfs_vn_fiemap, we should consider this worst case. If the
> > user wants fi_extent_max extents, we need a 'out' with size of
> > 2 *fi_extent_max + 2(one more the header).
>
> That's rather dangerous, I think. It relies on other code to catch
> the buffer overrun that this sets up for fragmented, non-sparse
> files. Personally I'd much prefer to return fewer extents for sparse
> files than to add a landmine like this into the kernel code....
I just had a thought - if you want to avoid holes being reported to
fiemap, then add a BMV_IF_NO_HOLES flag to xfs_getbmap() and skip
holes in the mappin gloop when this flag is set. That will make
fiemap fill in the full number of extents without hacking the
extent count...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sandeen@sandeen.net, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Make fiemap works with sparse file.
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:29:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614122912.GD6590@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100614002705.GA6590@dastard>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:27:06AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:08:15AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> > The reason is that in xfs_getbmap we will
> > calculate holes and set it in 'out', while out is malloced by
> > bmv_count(fi_extent_max+1) which didn't consider holes. So in the
> > worst case, if 'out' vector looks like
> > [hole, extent, hole, extent, hole, ... hole, extent, hole],
> > we will only return half of fi_extent_max extents.
>
> Right, it's not broken, we simply return less than fi_extent_mex
> extents when there are holes. I don't see that as a problem as
> applications have to handle that case anyway, and....
>
> > So in xfs_vn_fiemap, we should consider this worst case. If the
> > user wants fi_extent_max extents, we need a 'out' with size of
> > 2 *fi_extent_max + 2(one more the header).
>
> That's rather dangerous, I think. It relies on other code to catch
> the buffer overrun that this sets up for fragmented, non-sparse
> files. Personally I'd much prefer to return fewer extents for sparse
> files than to add a landmine like this into the kernel code....
I just had a thought - if you want to avoid holes being reported to
fiemap, then add a BMV_IF_NO_HOLES flag to xfs_getbmap() and skip
holes in the mappin gloop when this flag is set. That will make
fiemap fill in the full number of extents without hacking the
extent count...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-14 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-12 2:08 [PATCH v2] xfs: Make fiemap works with sparse file Tao Ma
2010-06-12 2:08 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-14 0:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 0:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 5:53 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-14 5:53 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-14 12:29 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-06-14 12:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 13:37 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-14 13:37 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-17 8:53 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-17 8:53 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-18 0:47 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-18 0:47 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-18 2:27 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-18 2:27 ` Tao Ma
2010-06-18 6:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-18 6:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-08-27 19:46 ` Alex Elder
2010-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v4] " Tao Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100614122912.GD6590@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=tao.ma@oracle.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.