* [PATCH][cr][nit]: eclone() - Remove extra __user and add a comment
@ 2010-05-04 2:04 Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20100504020439.GA5098-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2010-05-04 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oren Laadan
Cc: Containers, christofferdall-77OGu6e99YhyO3AAkE1OcX9LOBIZ5rWg,
linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ
Sorry, I thought I had sent this minor patch out earlier, but I just
realized I had not.
---
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:38:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] eclone(): Remove extra __user and add a comment
As pointed out by Russel King, '__user' does not make sense on an integer
type. Remove it. Also add a comment on why we want 'stack_size' to be 0
on x86 and s390.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
index efc7e8a..b00ffad 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *,
int __user *parent_tid_ptr;
int __user *child_tid_ptr;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned long __user child_stack;
+ unsigned long child_stack;
unsigned long stack_size;
rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca);
@@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *,
child_tid_ptr = (int __user *) kca.child_tid_ptr;
stack_size = (unsigned long) kca.child_stack_size;
+ /*
+ * s390 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused.
+ */
if (stack_size)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 5abad20..8b1699a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca,
unsigned long flags;
int __user *parent_tidp;
int __user *child_tidp;
- unsigned long __user stack;
+ unsigned long stack;
unsigned long stack_size;
rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca);
@@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca,
parent_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.parent_tid_ptr;
child_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.child_tid_ptr;
+ /*
+ * x86 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused.
+ */
stack_size = (unsigned long)kca.child_stack_size;
if (stack_size)
return -EINVAL;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20100504020439.GA5098-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH][cr][nit]: eclone() - Remove extra __user and add a comment [not found] ` <20100504020439.GA5098-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2010-06-15 2:55 ` Oren Laadan [not found] ` <4C16EBB1.7000806-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Oren Laadan @ 2010-06-15 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA, Containers, christofferdall-77OGu6e99YhyO3AAkE1OcX9LOBIZ5rWg, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ Applied in ckpt-v22-dev (will be pushed soon) Thanks, Oren. On 05/03/2010 10:04 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > Sorry, I thought I had sent this minor patch out earlier, but I just > realized I had not. > --- > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> > Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:38:16 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] eclone(): Remove extra __user and add a comment > > As pointed out by Russel King, '__user' does not make sense on an integer > type. Remove it. Also add a comment on why we want 'stack_size' to be 0 > on x86 and s390. > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> > --- > arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++- > arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c > index efc7e8a..b00ffad 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c > @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *, > int __user *parent_tid_ptr; > int __user *child_tid_ptr; > unsigned long flags; > - unsigned long __user child_stack; > + unsigned long child_stack; > unsigned long stack_size; > > rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca); > @@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *, > child_tid_ptr = (int __user *) kca.child_tid_ptr; > > stack_size = (unsigned long) kca.child_stack_size; > + /* > + * s390 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused. > + */ > if (stack_size) > return -EINVAL; > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > index 5abad20..8b1699a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca, > unsigned long flags; > int __user *parent_tidp; > int __user *child_tidp; > - unsigned long __user stack; > + unsigned long stack; > unsigned long stack_size; > > rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca); > @@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca, > parent_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.parent_tid_ptr; > child_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.child_tid_ptr; > > + /* > + * x86 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused. > + */ > stack_size = (unsigned long)kca.child_stack_size; > if (stack_size) > return -EINVAL; > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4C16EBB1.7000806-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH][cr][nit]: eclone() - Remove extra __user and add a comment [not found] ` <4C16EBB1.7000806-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> @ 2010-06-15 22:43 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [not found] ` <20100615224353.GA4985-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2010-06-15 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oren Laadan Cc: serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA, Containers, christofferdall-77OGu6e99YhyO3AAkE1OcX9LOBIZ5rWg, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ Oh, well, Albert pointed out we could make all architectures specify stack as base and offset so applications won't need #ifdefs. I am planning on resending the eclone patchset with that change. So the following change is not needed now. Sukadev Oren Laadan [orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org] wrote: | | Applied in ckpt-v22-dev (will be pushed soon) | | Thanks, | | Oren. | | On 05/03/2010 10:04 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: | > | > Sorry, I thought I had sent this minor patch out earlier, but I just | > realized I had not. | > --- | > | > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> | > Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:38:16 -0700 | > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] eclone(): Remove extra __user and add a comment | > | > As pointed out by Russel King, '__user' does not make sense on an integer | > type. Remove it. Also add a comment on why we want 'stack_size' to be 0 | > on x86 and s390. | > | > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> | > --- | > arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++- | > arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++- | > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) | > | > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c | > index efc7e8a..b00ffad 100644 | > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c | > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c | > @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *, | > int __user *parent_tid_ptr; | > int __user *child_tid_ptr; | > unsigned long flags; | > - unsigned long __user child_stack; | > + unsigned long child_stack; | > unsigned long stack_size; | > | > rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca); | > @@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *, | > child_tid_ptr = (int __user *) kca.child_tid_ptr; | > | > stack_size = (unsigned long) kca.child_stack_size; | > + /* | > + * s390 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused. | > + */ | > if (stack_size) | > return -EINVAL; | > | > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c | > index 5abad20..8b1699a 100644 | > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c | > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c | > @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca, | > unsigned long flags; | > int __user *parent_tidp; | > int __user *child_tidp; | > - unsigned long __user stack; | > + unsigned long stack; | > unsigned long stack_size; | > | > rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca); | > @@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca, | > parent_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.parent_tid_ptr; | > child_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.child_tid_ptr; | > | > + /* | > + * x86 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused. | > + */ | > stack_size = (unsigned long)kca.child_stack_size; | > if (stack_size) | > return -EINVAL; | > | > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20100615224353.GA4985-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH][cr][nit]: eclone() - Remove extra __user and add a comment [not found] ` <20100615224353.GA4985-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2010-06-16 19:36 ` Oren Laadan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Oren Laadan @ 2010-06-16 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA, Containers, christofferdall-77OGu6e99YhyO3AAkE1OcX9LOBIZ5rWg, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ Since I haven't pushed this yet, do you want me to un-pull this patch then ? Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > Oh, well, Albert pointed out we could make all architectures specify > stack as base and offset so applications won't need #ifdefs. I am > planning on resending the eclone patchset with that change. So > the following change is not needed now. > > Sukadev > > Oren Laadan [orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org] wrote: > | > | Applied in ckpt-v22-dev (will be pushed soon) > | > | Thanks, > | > | Oren. > | > | On 05/03/2010 10:04 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > | > > | > Sorry, I thought I had sent this minor patch out earlier, but I just > | > realized I had not. > | > --- > | > > | > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> > | > Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:38:16 -0700 > | > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] eclone(): Remove extra __user and add a comment > | > > | > As pointed out by Russel King, '__user' does not make sense on an integer > | > type. Remove it. Also add a comment on why we want 'stack_size' to be 0 > | > on x86 and s390. > | > > | > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> > | > --- > | > arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++- > | > arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 ++++- > | > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > | > > | > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c > | > index efc7e8a..b00ffad 100644 > | > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c > | > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c > | > @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *, > | > int __user *parent_tid_ptr; > | > int __user *child_tid_ptr; > | > unsigned long flags; > | > - unsigned long __user child_stack; > | > + unsigned long child_stack; > | > unsigned long stack_size; > | > > | > rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca); > | > @@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(eclone, unsigned int, flags_low, struct clone_args __user *, > | > child_tid_ptr = (int __user *) kca.child_tid_ptr; > | > > | > stack_size = (unsigned long) kca.child_stack_size; > | > + /* > | > + * s390 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused. > | > + */ > | > if (stack_size) > | > return -EINVAL; > | > > | > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > | > index 5abad20..8b1699a 100644 > | > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > | > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > | > @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca, > | > unsigned long flags; > | > int __user *parent_tidp; > | > int __user *child_tidp; > | > - unsigned long __user stack; > | > + unsigned long stack; > | > unsigned long stack_size; > | > > | > rc = fetch_clone_args_from_user(uca, args_size, &kca); > | > @@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ sys_eclone(unsigned flags_low, struct clone_args __user *uca, > | > parent_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.parent_tid_ptr; > | > child_tidp = (int *)(unsigned long)kca.child_tid_ptr; > | > > | > + /* > | > + * x86 does not need/use the stack_size. Ensure it is unused. > | > + */ > | > stack_size = (unsigned long)kca.child_stack_size; > | > if (stack_size) > | > return -EINVAL; > | > > | > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-16 19:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-04 2:04 [PATCH][cr][nit]: eclone() - Remove extra __user and add a comment Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20100504020439.GA5098-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 2:55 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4C16EBB1.7000806-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 22:43 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20100615224353.GA4985-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-16 19:36 ` Oren Laadan
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.