From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.miao@canonical.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] OMAP: PM: initial runtime PM core support
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:20:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100625202002.GC22090@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYE6Kg8C_ZClx9aKLvOa9CQRUT587hQnB91sua@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:13:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:26:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> This approach is also not multiplatform friendly (cc'ing Eric and
> >> Nicolas who are working on ARM multiplatform). It won't work for
> >> building a kernel that supports, say, both versatile and OMAP.
> >
> > And I should also point out that multiplatform is not the answer to
> > Linus' concerns. There's no way such work is going to be anywhere
> > near complete come the next merge window.
>
> Yes, but solving the defconfig problem isn't the reason for multiplatform.
Does anyone know where we are on the defconfig problem? From what I
can see, it's mostly stalled for the time being, which is not good
news for us.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] OMAP: PM: initial runtime PM core support
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:20:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100625202002.GC22090@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYE6Kg8C_ZClx9aKLvOa9CQRUT587hQnB91sua@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:13:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:26:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> This approach is also not multiplatform friendly (cc'ing Eric and
> >> Nicolas who are working on ARM multiplatform). ?It won't work for
> >> building a kernel that supports, say, both versatile and OMAP.
> >
> > And I should also point out that multiplatform is not the answer to
> > Linus' concerns. ?There's no way such work is going to be anywhere
> > near complete come the next merge window.
>
> Yes, but solving the defconfig problem isn't the reason for multiplatform.
Does anyone know where we are on the defconfig problem? From what I
can see, it's mostly stalled for the time being, which is not good
news for us.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-25 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-24 23:43 [PATCH v2 0/3] OMAP: add runtime PM support at bus-level Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 23:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] OMAP: PM: initial runtime PM core support Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 23:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-25 15:26 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 15:26 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 18:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-25 18:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-25 20:08 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 20:08 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 21:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-25 21:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-25 22:30 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 22:30 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 22:46 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-25 22:46 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-25 23:04 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 23:04 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-28 21:49 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-28 21:49 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-28 22:14 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-28 22:14 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-28 23:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-28 23:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-28 23:47 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-28 23:47 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-25 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-25 20:13 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 20:13 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-25 20:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-06-25 20:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-25 23:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-25 23:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-26 10:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-26 10:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-26 11:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-26 11:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-04 22:55 ` Grant Likely
2010-08-04 22:55 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-24 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] OMAP: bus-level PM: enable use of runtime PM API for suspend/resume Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 23:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] OMAP1: PM: add simple runtime PM layer to manage clocks Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 23:43 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100625202002.GC22090@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=eric.miao@canonical.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.