Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing

[Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>]

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:41:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> > > > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
> > > > 
> > > > The module loads fine:
> > > > 
> > > > # modprobe w83627ehf
> > > > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> > > > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> > > > chip at 0xa10
> > > > # sensors
> > > > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > > > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > > > in0:         +0.98 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +1.74 V)  
> > > > in1:         +1.11 V  (min =  +0.10 V, max =  +0.20 V)   ALARM
> > > > in2:         +3.36 V  (min =  +3.95 V, max =  +3.28 V)   ALARM
> > > > in3:         +3.36 V  (min =  +1.57 V, max =  +2.10 V)   ALARM
> > > > in4:         +1.10 V  (min =  +1.74 V, max =  +1.87 V)   ALARM
> > > > in5:         +1.18 V  (min =  +1.02 V, max =  +1.30 V)  
> > > > in7:         +3.28 V  (min =  +3.23 V, max =  +2.62 V)   ALARM
> > > > in8:         +3.34 V  (min =  +3.18 V, max =  +0.05 V)   ALARM
> > > > fan1:          0 RPM  (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128)  ALARM
> > > > fan2:       1022 RPM  (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8)  ALARM
> > > > fan3:          0 RPM  (min =  958 RPM, div = 128)  ALARM
> > > > fan4:          0 RPM  (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128)  ALARM
> > > > fan5:          0 RPM  (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128)  ALARM
> > > > temp1:       +30.0°C  (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C)  ALARM  sensor > > > > thermistor
> > > > temp2:       +41.5°C  (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C)  sensor = thermistor
> > > > temp3:        -3.0°C  (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C)  sensor = thermistor
> > > > cpu0_vid:   +0.000 V
> > > > 
> > > Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
> > > Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
> > > 
> > > Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
> > 
> > Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
> > flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
> > are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
> > check that all the alarms go away.
> > 
> > The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
> > there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
> > ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
> > from the right register/bit.
> > 
> I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips,
> unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on.

I seem to remember that on some of these chips, in6 and temp3 are
mutually exclusive? So you may have to check all the configuration
registers which determine which of in6 or temp3 is enabled. Maybe in6
is enabled and the driver wrongfully think temp3 is instead?

Just a random idea, I may be completely off the track.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors