From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bug 16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:03:20 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007232003.o6NK3KVr028126@demeter.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-16265-2300@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
--- Comment #1 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2010-07-23 20:03:18 ---
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 13:47 Fri 23 Jul , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
> > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
> > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (45 days old)
>
> I actually haven't been able to reproduce with kernels since a couple
> weeks ago (still reproducible if I go back to 2.6.35-rc3, though).
> Seems to be fixed somehow, can anyone else confirm?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-21 19:04 [Bug 16265] New: Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-23 20:03 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2010-07-23 20:03 ` [Bug 16265] " bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-24 13:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-01 13:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-01 13:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-13 19:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-07 6:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-22 11:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 10:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 11:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 11:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 11:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-15 20:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-15 22:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-16 9:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-16 12:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-16 19:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-16 22:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-18 18:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-18 18:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 16:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 16:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 17:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 17:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-08 23:33 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 14:41 ` Nick Bowler
2010-07-23 14:41 ` Nick Bowler
[not found] ` <20100723144143.GA14650-7BP4RkwGw0uXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 18:27 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-07-23 18:27 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-01 13:46 2.6.35-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-01 13:52 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-01 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 22:57 2.6.36-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:54 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:57 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:29 2.6.36-rc5-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:33 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:36 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:53 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-10 19:10 2.6.36-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-10 19:18 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:53 2.6.36-rc8-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:55 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007232003.o6NK3KVr028126@demeter.kernel.org \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.