From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bug 16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:35:57 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101152235.p0FMZvx9003935@demeter2.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-16265-2300@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
--- Comment #12 from Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> 2011-01-15 22:35:48 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> This issue is still present for me with Intel 4500 MHD (intel driver 2.14.0,
> xorg-server 1.9.3.901, mesa 7.9.1, libdrm 2.4.23) with gentoo-sources 2.6.37.
> I've read this announcement and disabled my drm_kms_helper.poll=N kernel boot
> param but the issue has come up after few minutes after booting. System was
> sluggish and kworker process appeared eating 60% CPU.
Different culprit - you neither have the affected hardware nor the responsible
hotplug polling enabled.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-15 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-21 19:04 [Bug 16265] New: Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-23 20:03 ` [Bug 16265] " bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-23 20:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-24 13:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-01 13:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-01 13:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-13 19:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-07 6:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-22 11:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 10:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 11:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 11:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-12 11:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-15 20:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-15 22:35 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2011-01-16 9:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-16 12:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-16 19:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-16 22:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-18 18:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-18 18:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 16:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 16:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 17:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-04-09 17:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-08 23:33 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 14:41 ` Nick Bowler
2010-07-23 14:41 ` Nick Bowler
[not found] ` <20100723144143.GA14650-7BP4RkwGw0uXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 18:27 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-07-23 18:27 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-01 13:46 2.6.35-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-01 13:52 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-01 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 22:57 2.6.36-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:54 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:57 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:29 2.6.36-rc5-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:33 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:36 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:53 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-10 19:10 2.6.36-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-10 19:18 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:53 2.6.36-rc8-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:55 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101152235.p0FMZvx9003935@demeter2.kernel.org \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.