All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: skillzero@gmail.com
Cc: "Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>,
	"Marc Branchaud" <marcnarc@xiplink.com>,
	"Jens Lehmann" <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Bryan Larsen" <bryan.larsen@gmail.com>,
	git <git@vger.kernel.org>, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree?
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:56:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007261056.58985.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinhd2DYh7WXzMvhMkqp98fYtTWWuQi0RSL9Rome@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 24, 2010, skillzero@gmail.com napisał:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Honest question: do you care about the wasted disk space and download
> > time for these extra files?  Or just the fact that git gets slow when
> > you have them?
> 
> I have the similar situation to the original poster (huge trees) and
> for me it's all three: disk space, download time, and performance. My
> tree has a few relatively small (< 20 MB) shared directories of common
> code, a few large (2-6 GB) directories of code for OS's, and then
> several medium size (< 500 MB) directories for application code. The
> application developers only care about the app+shared directories (and
> are very annoyed by the massive space and performance impact of the OS
> directories). The firmware-only developers only care about OS+shared
> and are mildly annoyed by the medium space and performance impact of
> the app directories. I work on all of the pieces, but even I would
> prefer to have things separated so when I work on the apps, git
> status/etc doesn't take a big hit for close to a million files in the
> OS directories (particularly when doing git status on Windows). Even
> when using the -uno option to git status, it's still pretty slow (over
> a minute).
> 
> git-submodule might be technically possible in this situation, but
> having to commit and push each submodule and then commit and push the
> super module makes it slightly worse than just dealing with the
> space/download/performance issues of one huge repository.

But this is just a matter for improving UI for dealing with submodules,
isn't it.   For example having "git commit --recursive" would help
with 'having to commit each submodule', though how you would write commit
messages then: perhaps supermodule commit message could be by default
composed out of submodules commits (if any).  "git push --recursive"
(or some support for push in "git remote") would help with 'having to
push each submodule'.

Isn't it?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-26  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-21 17:15 Avery Pennarun's git-subtree? Bryan Larsen
2010-07-21 19:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-21 19:56   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-21 20:36     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-21 21:09       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-21 21:20         ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-21 22:46         ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-22  1:09           ` Avery Pennarun
     [not found]             ` <m31vavn8la.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
2010-07-22 18:23               ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-24 22:36                 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-22 19:41               ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-22 19:56                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-07-22 20:06                   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-22 20:17                   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-22 21:33                     ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23 15:10                       ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-26 17:34                       ` Eugene Sajine
2010-07-22 20:43                   ` Elijah Newren
2010-07-22 21:32                     ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23  8:31                 ` Chris Webb
2010-07-23  8:40                   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23 15:11                     ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 22:33                       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23 15:13                     ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 15:10                 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 16:05                   ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-23 17:11                     ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 19:01                       ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-23 22:32                   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-25 19:57                     ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-27 18:40                       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-27 21:14                         ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 15:19                 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-23 22:50                   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-24  0:58                     ` skillzero
2010-07-24  1:20                       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-24 19:40                         ` skillzero
2010-07-25  1:47                           ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-07-28 22:27                             ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-26 13:13                           ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-26 16:37                         ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-26 16:41                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-26 17:36                             ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-26 17:48                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-27 18:28                             ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-27 20:25                               ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-27 20:57                                 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-27 21:14                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-27 21:32                                   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-26  8:56                       ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2010-07-27 18:36                         ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-28 13:36                           ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-28 18:32                           ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-24 20:07                     ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-07-26  8:51                     ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-27 19:15                       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-26 15:15                     ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-21 23:46         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201007261056.58985.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=bryan.larsen@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
    --cc=skillzero@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.