All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [linux-lvm] Grub 1 vs 2
@ 2010-07-30  3:46 Brian McCullough
  2010-07-30 15:26 ` Stuart D. Gathman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian McCullough @ 2010-07-30  3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LVM general discussion and development

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:10:15PM -0400, Stuart D Gathman wrote:
>
> Use a large /boot partition.  The last time I used Ubuntu, it did not
> easily support having a separate /boot filesystem (instead making the
> root fs bootable), so that could be a problem, unless Ubuntu also
> supports grub 2 (with LVM support).

Stuart,

Slightly hijacking this thread, but forking.  Yes, Ubuntu 10.04 does seem to support Grub 2.  In fact, that's where my problem arises.

I guess I didn't understand the implications of switching to Grub 2, because I let Ubuntu 10.04 do so when I was trying to dual boot a Grub 1 machine that I had.  Once it was finished, I could not find the old system at all, and the menu.lst ( or grub.conf or whatever ) in /boot/grub seems to have no effect on anything.  At least changes that I make seem to do nothing.

Certainly I can mount the LVs that comprised the old system, so I know that the install did not overwrite the LVs that I did not tell it to use, but I can not seem to boot the old system.


Any sage advice?


Thanks,
Brian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-30 17:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-30  3:46 [linux-lvm] Grub 1 vs 2 Brian McCullough
2010-07-30 15:26 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2010-07-30 17:54   ` Oscar Dijkhoff

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.