From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Please pull my perf.git urgent branch
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 07:51:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100803055101.GC1130@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100802171654.1776759c@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
* Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:47:31 +1000
> Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:28:54AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't the setting of .period need to be maintained (it is in the other
> > > powerpc perf_event implementation that this is derived from)?
> >
> > Gah, yes it does.
>
> Well, looks like Linus pulled anyway... I'll send a patch to
> add .period.
Yes, the original commit was already upstream when you reported this bug.
Paul added a -stable tag to the fix so it will get into the .35.1 pipeline
this week.
Thanks,
Ingo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Please pull my perf.git urgent branch
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 07:51:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100803055101.GC1130@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100802171654.1776759c@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
* Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:47:31 +1000
> Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:28:54AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't the setting of .period need to be maintained (it is in the other
> > > powerpc perf_event implementation that this is derived from)?
> >
> > Gah, yes it does.
>
> Well, looks like Linus pulled anyway... I'll send a patch to
> add .period.
Yes, the original commit was already upstream when you reported this bug.
Paul added a -stable tag to the fix so it will get into the .35.1 pipeline
this week.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-03 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-27 12:40 Please pull my perf.git urgent branch Paul Mackerras
2010-07-27 12:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-27 16:28 ` Scott Wood
2010-07-27 16:28 ` Scott Wood
2010-07-28 4:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-28 4:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-28 16:15 ` Kumar Gala
2010-07-28 16:15 ` Kumar Gala
2010-08-02 22:16 ` Scott Wood
2010-08-02 22:16 ` Scott Wood
2010-08-03 5:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-08-03 5:51 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100803055101.GC1130@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.