From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach)
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:04:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100804090455.GE12134@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimTwxV7=xOF+t6fB5iC-2p4ODH89z40HwR3kiDp@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 03-08-10 15:35, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:13:58PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@ti.com>
> >>>
> >>> If noone objects, can we get this in ASAP?
> >>
> >> Building from scratch armv4t then armv6 was ok, building few more
> >> packages for armv4t again still worked, but now I've upgraded gcc/eglibc
> >> and building eglibc-initial for armv4t first fails:
> >>
> >> http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/665289/
> >> http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/config.log
> >>
> >> see
> >> configure: error: compiler support for __thread is require
> >> and
> >> Fatal error: Invalid -march= option: `armv4t'
> >
> > I had that with a previous incarnation of that patchset, but it seems to
> > have gone away.
> > Do we want to solve this problem first or apply the patches and solve it
> > later?
> I would suggest that I push these changes and meanwhile
> I will try to reproduce Martin's problem it will take few hours on my
> box. It seems that the binutils got wiped out
> when Martin cleaned stuff and then building eglibc resorted to
> assembler on build machine
> and that bombs later.
I think I had last incarnation (at last latest on patchwork - pw-am.sh
2521 2524 2525 2523 2522).
Khem was right about binutils issue.
I did something like this:
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image
MACHINE=htcdream bitbake shr-image
git pull (for newer gcc+eglibc)
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - and now it failed to build eglibc-initial
MACHINE=htcdream bitbake shr-image - this upgraded gcc/eglibc fine
export MACHINE=om-gta02
for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb \
openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb; do
bitbake -c clean -b $i;
done
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - still failing in eglibc-initial
export MACHINE=htcdream
for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb \
openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb; do
bitbake -c clean -b $i;
done
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - still failing in eglibc-initial
export MACHINE=om-gta02
for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb
openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb
openembedded/recipes/binutils/binutils*2.20.1*.bb ; do
bitbake -c clean -b $i;
done
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - seems to pass now
Regards,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-31 5:34 [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] bitbake.conf, cmake.bbclass, cross.bbclass, icecc.bbclass: Point the toolchain paths to new multi-machine friendly toolchain install location Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] binutils-cross.inc: Dont install duplicate copies of tools create relative symlinks instead Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] gcc, eglibc: Use the paths for mutli-machine safe toolchain install Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] recipes: Fix the PATHs for toolchains Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] mpfr_3.0.0.bb: Override needs to be thumb instead of armv4t Khem Raj
2010-07-31 9:48 ` [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) Koen Kooi
2010-07-31 13:34 ` Koen Kooi
2010-07-31 18:54 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-02 9:33 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-02 16:27 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-03 10:13 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-03 10:21 ` Martin Jansa
2010-08-03 10:29 ` Andrea Adami
2010-08-03 10:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-08-03 13:35 ` Martin Jansa
2010-08-03 15:36 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-03 17:20 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-04 9:04 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2010-08-03 19:58 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-03 19:56 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-01 15:48 ` Eric Bénard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100804090455.GE12134@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.