From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64: Fix perf_arch_get_caller_regs().
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:14:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100809171440.GB5329@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100808.220450.148531617.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:04:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> After b0f82b81fe6bbcf78d478071f33e44554726bc81 ("perf: Drop the skip
> argument from perf_arch_fetch_regs_caller") the build broke on sparc64
> due to the lack of a module symbol export of __perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs.
>
> But that assembler helper can actually be complete eliminated now that
> the semantics of this interface have been greatly simplified.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
>
> Frederic, I'll merge this to Linus via the sparc tree, this is
> just FYI...
Ok thanks a lot! I have no more access to a Sparc box, so I'm
sorry I can't anymore test perf and ftrace on this architecture :)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64: Fix perf_arch_get_caller_regs().
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:14:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100809171440.GB5329@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100808.220450.148531617.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:04:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> After b0f82b81fe6bbcf78d478071f33e44554726bc81 ("perf: Drop the skip
> argument from perf_arch_fetch_regs_caller") the build broke on sparc64
> due to the lack of a module symbol export of __perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs.
>
> But that assembler helper can actually be complete eliminated now that
> the semantics of this interface have been greatly simplified.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
>
> Frederic, I'll merge this to Linus via the sparc tree, this is
> just FYI...
Ok thanks a lot! I have no more access to a Sparc box, so I'm
sorry I can't anymore test perf and ftrace on this architecture :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-09 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-09 5:04 [PATCH] sparc64: Fix perf_arch_get_caller_regs() David Miller
2010-08-09 5:04 ` David Miller
2010-08-09 17:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-08-09 17:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-09 20:03 ` David Miller
2010-08-09 20:03 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100809171440.GB5329@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.