From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
len.brown@intel.com, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI patches for 2.6.36.merge
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:21:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100815182153.994179c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Ok3NH3k5EF1Da2Z3xA7uahABRtH7pEdOEuZH2@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:04:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'd be suspecting that we have two patches both of which worked
> > separately but which broke when combined. Is there some other patch in
> > that tree which adds a new reference to `ref' in acpi_power_seq_show()?
>
> The offending patch isn't about acpi_power_seq_show(), it's about
> acpi_power_off_device().
The patch I sent Len patched acpi_power_seq_show().
>
> ...
>
> What does that say about the _rest_ of the patches?
Not tested in combination?
> What does that say about (lack of) -next testing?
That code compiled OK in -mm which includes linux-next. I assume that
some last-minute merging broke things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
len.brown@intel.com, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI patches for 2.6.36.merge
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:21:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100815182153.994179c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Ok3NH3k5EF1Da2Z3xA7uahABRtH7pEdOEuZH2@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:04:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'd be suspecting that we have two patches both of which worked
> > separately but which broke when combined. Is there some other patch in
> > that tree which adds a new reference to `ref' in acpi_power_seq_show()?
>
> The offending patch isn't about acpi_power_seq_show(), it's about
> acpi_power_off_device().
The patch I sent Len patched acpi_power_seq_show().
>
> ...
>
> What does that say about the _rest_ of the patches?
Not tested in combination?
> What does that say about (lack of) -next testing?
That code compiled OK in -mm which includes linux-next. I assume that
some last-minute merging broke things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-15 10:41 [git pull request] ACPI patches for 2.6.36.merge Sedat Dilek
2010-08-15 11:13 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-08-15 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-15 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-15 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-15 21:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-15 21:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-16 1:21 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-08-16 1:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-16 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-16 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-16 2:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-24 22:35 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-15 5:12 Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100815182153.994179c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.