From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intel graphics CPU usage - SDVO detect bogosity?
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100816025146.GA1639@arch.tripp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=NFpeyo7Q31yMfqKSP2c-2OS2ccqa=Q9CQ8bpk@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:32:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I started wondering why 'top' was showing an otherwise idle system as
> having a load average of 0.5+, and worker threads constantly using the
> CPU.
>
> So I did a system-wide profile, and got the attached output (look at
> it in a really wide terminal).
>
> There seems to be something _seriously_ wrong with i915 SDVO detect.
> This is on an Apple Mac Mini (hey, your favorite problem child!), and
> apparently it spends 20% of its non-idle CPU time just doing udelay's
> for the i2c SDVO connection detection.
>
> That sounds a bit wrong, doesn't it?
>
> I don't know how recent this is - it might have been going on for some
> time without me noticing. It's the wife's computer, and the same thing
> doesn't seem to happen on my Core i5 desktop
>
> Any ideas? Any information I can give about the machine?
You're not alone. I'm seeing similar things on my machine (AMD,Radeon).
The monitor outputs are polled every 10 sec in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c.
There is a patch attached to the following bug report that disables
polling and solves the problem for me:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29536
--
»A man who doesn't know he is in prison can never escape.«
William S. Burroughs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Intel graphics CPU usage - SDVO detect bogosity?
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100816025146.GA1639@arch.tripp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=NFpeyo7Q31yMfqKSP2c-2OS2ccqa=Q9CQ8bpk@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:32:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I started wondering why 'top' was showing an otherwise idle system as
> having a load average of 0.5+, and worker threads constantly using the
> CPU.
>
> So I did a system-wide profile, and got the attached output (look at
> it in a really wide terminal).
>
> There seems to be something _seriously_ wrong with i915 SDVO detect.
> This is on an Apple Mac Mini (hey, your favorite problem child!), and
> apparently it spends 20% of its non-idle CPU time just doing udelay's
> for the i2c SDVO connection detection.
>
> That sounds a bit wrong, doesn't it?
>
> I don't know how recent this is - it might have been going on for some
> time without me noticing. It's the wife's computer, and the same thing
> doesn't seem to happen on my Core i5 desktop
>
> Any ideas? Any information I can give about the machine?
You're not alone. I'm seeing similar things on my machine (AMD,Radeon).
The monitor outputs are polled every 10 sec in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c.
There is a patch attached to the following bug report that disables
polling and solves the problem for me:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29536
--
»A man who doesn't know he is in prison can never escape.«
William S. Burroughs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-16 2:32 Intel graphics CPU usage - SDVO detect bogosity? Linus Torvalds
2010-08-16 2:51 ` Markus Trippelsdorf [this message]
2010-08-16 2:51 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-08-16 3:30 ` Dave Airlie
2010-08-16 3:30 ` Dave Airlie
2010-08-16 4:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-16 4:29 ` Dave Airlie
2010-08-16 4:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2010-08-16 4:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-16 4:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-16 14:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2010-08-16 15:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Adam Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100816025146.GA1639@arch.tripp.de \
--to=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.