All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] md: remove dependency on __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:23:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823132315.6906ddbe.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008231303410.17716@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > Hows about you add a helper function
> > 
> > 	void *[kmalloc|alloc_page]_retrying_forever_because_i_suck(lots of args)
> > 
> > then convert the callsites to use that, then nuke __GFP_NOFAIL?
> > 
> 
> That would only serve as documentation

Is that bad?

> of a caller that could potentially 
> loop forever waiting for memory (which I did by adding "/* FIXME: this may 
> potentially loop forever */")

A helper function could check that appropriate gfp flags are being set.

> since all of the allocations in this 
> patchset never loop in the code that was added, they already loop forever 
> in the page allocator doing the same thing.  The hope is that kswapd will 
> eventually be able to free memory since direct reclaim will usually fail 
> for GFP_NOFS and we simply need to wait long enough for there to be 
> memory.

While holding locks which will prevent kswapd from doing anything useful.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-23 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-17  2:57 [patch 0/6] remove dependency on __GFP_NOFAIL David Rientjes
2010-08-17  2:57 ` [patch 1/6] md: " David Rientjes
2010-08-23 19:26   ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 19:35     ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 19:51       ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 20:03         ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:01       ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 20:08         ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:23           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-08-23 20:37             ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:09         ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-23 20:09           ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-23 20:13           ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:29             ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-23 20:40               ` David Rientjes
2010-08-17  2:57 ` [patch 2/6] btrfs: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17  2:57 ` [patch 3/6] gfs2: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17  2:58 ` [patch 4/6] jbd: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17  9:51   ` Jan Kara
2010-08-17 17:48     ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 19:28     ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 22:03       ` Jan Kara
2010-08-23 22:11         ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 22:21           ` Jan Kara
2010-08-23 22:22           ` David Rientjes
2010-08-17  2:58 ` [patch 5/6] ntfs: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17  2:58 ` [patch 6/6] reiserfs: " David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100823132315.6906ddbe.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.