From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] hugetlb: add allocate function for hugepage migration
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:29:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100825012941.GD7283@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282694127-14609-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> +static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +{
> + struct page *page = __alloc_huge_page_node(h, nid);
> if (page) {
> - if (arch_prepare_hugepage(page)) {
> - __free_pages(page, huge_page_order(h));
> + set_compound_page_dtor(page, free_huge_page);
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + h->nr_huge_pages++;
> + h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + put_page_testzero(page);
> + }
> + return page;
> +}
One would expect the alloc_buddy_huge_page_node() to only differ with
alloc_buddy_huge_page() in the alloc_pages/alloc_pages_exact_node
calls. However you implement alloc_buddy_huge_page_node() in a quite
different way. Can the two functions be unified at all?
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] hugetlb: add allocate function for hugepage migration
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:29:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100825012941.GD7283@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282694127-14609-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> +static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +{
> + struct page *page = __alloc_huge_page_node(h, nid);
> if (page) {
> - if (arch_prepare_hugepage(page)) {
> - __free_pages(page, huge_page_order(h));
> + set_compound_page_dtor(page, free_huge_page);
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + h->nr_huge_pages++;
> + h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + put_page_testzero(page);
> + }
> + return page;
> +}
One would expect the alloc_buddy_huge_page_node() to only differ with
alloc_buddy_huge_page() in the alloc_pages/alloc_pages_exact_node
calls. However you implement alloc_buddy_huge_page_node() in a quite
different way. Can the two functions be unified at all?
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-24 23:55 [PATCH 0/8] Hugepage migration (v3) Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/8] hugetlb: fix metadata corruption in hugetlb_fault() Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-25 0:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-25 0:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/8] hugetlb: add allocate function for hugepage migration Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-25 1:29 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-08-25 1:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-26 8:24 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-26 8:24 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] hugetlb: rename hugepage allocation functions Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-25 1:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-25 1:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-26 8:25 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-26 8:25 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: redefine hugepage copy functions Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 5/8] hugetlb: hugepage migration core Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 6/8] HWPOISON, hugetlb: soft offlining for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-25 3:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-25 3:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 7/8] HWPOISON, hugetlb: fix unpoison " Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-25 2:54 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-25 2:54 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-26 8:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-26 8:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 8/8] page-types.c: fix name of unpoison interface Naoya Horiguchi
2010-08-24 23:55 ` Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100825012941.GD7283@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.