All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
To: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Serious problem with ticket spinlocks on ia64
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:37:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008271837.10014.ptesarik@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100827145231.GZ18967@zorg.emea.sgi.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]

On Friday 27 of August 2010 16:52:31 Hedi Berriche wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:40 Petr Tesarik wrote:
> | On Friday 27 of August 2010 16:31:35 Hedi Berriche wrote:
> | > That said, I'm letting my already over 36 hours run carry on chewing
> | > CPU time, and see if it will eventually trip the same problem seen with
> | > 4-byte ticket locks.
> |
> | Hm, this doesn't sound like a viable approach. Since the siglock gets
> | initialized to 0 when a new process is started, it may never actually
> | wrap around.
> |
> | I would rather attach a SystemTap probe somewhere during process fork and
> | add a bias to the siglock. That should work fine. Let me knock up the
> | SystemTap script...
>
> That would be nice. Ta!

Here it is. I don't have a system with the old 64-bit ticket spinlocks at 
hand, so this is completely untested, but it should work fine.

Adjust if needed.

Petr

[-- Attachment #2: biaslock.stp --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 455 bytes --]

/* Bias the spin lock on fork */

%{
#define LOCK_BIAS ((1ULL << 32) - (1ULL << 15))
%}

function bias_siglock (task:long)
%{
	struct task_struct *tsk = (struct task_struct*)THIS->task;
	tsk->sighand->siglock.raw_lock.lock = LOCK_BIAS + (LOCK_BIAS << 32);
%}

function is_err (value:long)
%{
	THIS->__retvalue = IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)THIS->value);
%}

probe kernel.function("copy_process").return
{
	if (!is_err($return))
		bias_siglock($return);
}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
To: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Serious problem with ticket spinlocks on ia64
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:37:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008271837.10014.ptesarik@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100827145231.GZ18967@zorg.emea.sgi.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]

On Friday 27 of August 2010 16:52:31 Hedi Berriche wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:40 Petr Tesarik wrote:
> | On Friday 27 of August 2010 16:31:35 Hedi Berriche wrote:
> | > That said, I'm letting my already over 36 hours run carry on chewing
> | > CPU time, and see if it will eventually trip the same problem seen with
> | > 4-byte ticket locks.
> |
> | Hm, this doesn't sound like a viable approach. Since the siglock gets
> | initialized to 0 when a new process is started, it may never actually
> | wrap around.
> |
> | I would rather attach a SystemTap probe somewhere during process fork and
> | add a bias to the siglock. That should work fine. Let me knock up the
> | SystemTap script...
>
> That would be nice. Ta!

Here it is. I don't have a system with the old 64-bit ticket spinlocks at 
hand, so this is completely untested, but it should work fine.

Adjust if needed.

Petr

[-- Attachment #2: biaslock.stp --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 455 bytes --]

/* Bias the spin lock on fork */

%{
#define LOCK_BIAS ((1ULL << 32) - (1ULL << 15))
%}

function bias_siglock (task:long)
%{
	struct task_struct *tsk = (struct task_struct*)THIS->task;
	tsk->sighand->siglock.raw_lock.lock = LOCK_BIAS + (LOCK_BIAS << 32);
%}

function is_err (value:long)
%{
	THIS->__retvalue = IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)THIS->value);
%}

probe kernel.function("copy_process").return
{
	if (!is_err($return))
		bias_siglock($return);
}

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-27 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-27 13:37 Serious problem with ticket spinlocks on ia64 Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 13:37 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 13:48 ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 13:48   ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 14:09   ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 14:09     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 14:31     ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 14:31       ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 14:40       ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 14:40         ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 14:52         ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 14:52           ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 16:37           ` Petr Tesarik [this message]
2010-08-27 16:37             ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 16:08 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 16:08   ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 17:16   ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 17:16     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 18:20     ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 18:20       ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 19:40     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 19:40       ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 20:29   ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 20:29     ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 20:41     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 20:41       ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 21:03     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 21:03       ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 21:11       ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 21:11         ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 22:13         ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 22:13           ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 23:26           ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 23:26             ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 23:55             ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 23:55               ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-28  0:28               ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-28  0:28                 ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-28  5:01                 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-28  5:01                   ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-30 18:17                   ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-30 18:17                     ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-30 21:41                     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-30 21:41                       ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-30 22:43                       ` Tony Luck
2010-08-30 22:43                         ` Tony Luck
2010-08-31 22:17                         ` Tony Luck
2010-08-31 22:17                           ` Tony Luck
2010-09-01 23:09                           ` Tony Luck
2010-09-01 23:09                             ` Tony Luck
2010-09-02  0:26                             ` Hedi Berriche
2010-09-02  0:26                               ` Hedi Berriche
2010-09-03  0:06                               ` Tony Luck
2010-09-03  0:06                                 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-03  9:04                                 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03  9:04                                   ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 14:35                                   ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 14:35                                     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 14:52                                     ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 14:52                                       ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 15:50                                       ` Tony Luck
2010-09-03 15:50                                         ` Tony Luck
2010-09-06 14:47                                         ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-06 14:47                                           ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-07 13:17                                           ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-07 13:17                                             ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-07 17:35                                             ` Tony Luck
2010-09-07 17:35                                               ` Tony Luck
2010-09-08 15:55                                               ` Tony Luck
2010-09-08 15:55                                                 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-10  2:55                                     ` Dave Jones
2010-09-10  2:55                                       ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201008271837.10014.ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --to=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=hedi@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.