Re: [RFC] review process

[Roman I Khimov <roman@khimov.ru>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 983 bytes --]

В сообщении от Пятница 27 августа 2010 16:15:01 автор Frans Meulenbroeks 
написал:
> 1. If a patch does not get any review feedback in X weeks time; it is
> ok to apply it. People who need more time to review a patch can
> mention that in a short reply. In that case they are granted Y more
> weeks to review.
> (suggestion: X = Y = 2)
> 2. If someone NAKs a patch it is obligatory to provide an explanation
> why the patch is not good.
> Rationale is that
> a) people can fix the problem seen by the reviewer
> b) people learn from it
> c) if there is a disagreement it can be discussed (and if needed
> raised to the TSC)
> 3) NAKs that are not motivated/explained can be ignored as not given.

Looks good to me, especially the first one as some defined period of time to 
wait is useful. Two weeks is OK.

-- 
 http://roman.khimov.ru
mailto: roman@khimov.ru
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]