From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pierre Bourdon <pbourdon@excellency.fr>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] sched: On-demand cfs_rq list
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:30:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100828223547.016319253@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100828223025.054328145@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-tg-ondemand.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11706 bytes --]
Make certain load-balance actions scale per number of active cgroups
instead of the number of existing cgroups.
This makes wakeup/sleep paths more expensive, but is a win for systems
where the vast majority of existing cgroups are idle.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 86 +++++++++-------------------------------------------
kernel/sched_fair.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sched_rt.c | 24 ++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
* leaf_cfs_rq_list ties together list of leaf cfs_rq's in a cpu. This
* list is used during load balance.
*/
+ int on_list;
struct list_head leaf_cfs_rq_list;
struct task_group *tg; /* group that "owns" this runqueue */
@@ -1529,7 +1530,7 @@ static unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_ta
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
+static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb);
static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
/*
@@ -1552,7 +1553,7 @@ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_grou
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
update_rq_clock(rq);
- update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 1);
load_avg = div64_u64(cfs_rq->load_avg, cfs_rq->load_period+1);
load_avg -= cfs_rq->load_contribution;
@@ -7553,15 +7554,13 @@ static void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
- struct sched_entity *se, int cpu, int add,
+ struct sched_entity *se, int cpu,
struct sched_entity *parent)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
tg->cfs_rq[cpu] = cfs_rq;
init_cfs_rq(cfs_rq, rq);
cfs_rq->tg = tg;
- if (add)
- list_add(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
tg->se[cpu] = se;
/* se could be NULL for init_task_group */
@@ -7581,7 +7580,7 @@ static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct tas
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
static void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct rt_rq *rt_rq,
- struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int cpu, int add,
+ struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int cpu,
struct sched_rt_entity *parent)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
@@ -7590,8 +7589,6 @@ static void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task
init_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq);
rt_rq->tg = tg;
rt_rq->rt_runtime = tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime;
- if (add)
- list_add(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, &rq->leaf_rt_rq_list);
tg->rt_se[cpu] = rt_se;
if (!rt_se)
@@ -7700,7 +7697,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
* We achieve this by letting init_task_group's tasks sit
* directly in rq->cfs (i.e init_task_group->se[] = NULL).
*/
- init_tg_cfs_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, 1, NULL);
+ init_tg_cfs_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
@@ -7708,7 +7705,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->leaf_rt_rq_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
- init_tg_rt_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, 1, NULL);
+ init_tg_rt_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, NULL);
#endif
#endif
@@ -7984,7 +7981,7 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
if (!se)
goto err_free_rq;
- init_tg_cfs_entry(tg, cfs_rq, se, i, 0, parent->se[i]);
+ init_tg_cfs_entry(tg, cfs_rq, se, i, parent->se[i]);
}
return 1;
@@ -8015,14 +8012,6 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
{
return 1;
}
-
-static inline void register_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
-
-static inline void unregister_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -8074,7 +8063,7 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_gro
if (!rt_se)
goto err_free_rq;
- init_tg_rt_entry(tg, rt_rq, rt_se, i, 0, parent->rt_se[i]);
+ init_tg_rt_entry(tg, rt_rq, rt_se, i, parent->rt_se[i]);
}
return 1;
@@ -8084,17 +8073,6 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_gro
err:
return 0;
}
-
-static inline void register_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
- list_add_rcu(&tg->rt_rq[cpu]->leaf_rt_rq_list,
- &cpu_rq(cpu)->leaf_rt_rq_list);
-}
-
-static inline void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
- list_del_rcu(&tg->rt_rq[cpu]->leaf_rt_rq_list);
-}
#else /* !CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
static inline void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
{
@@ -8105,14 +8083,6 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_gro
{
return 1;
}
-
-static inline void register_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
-
-static inline void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
@@ -8128,7 +8098,6 @@ struct task_group *sched_create_group(st
{
struct task_group *tg;
unsigned long flags;
- int i;
tg = kzalloc(sizeof(*tg), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tg)
@@ -8141,10 +8110,6 @@ struct task_group *sched_create_group(st
goto err;
spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- register_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- register_rt_sched_group(tg, i);
- }
list_add_rcu(&tg->list, &task_groups);
WARN_ON(!parent); /* root should already exist */
@@ -8175,10 +8140,12 @@ void sched_destroy_group(struct task_gro
int i;
spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- unregister_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- unregister_rt_sched_group(tg, i);
- }
+ /*
+ * XXX should not be a race against enqueue, even without rq->lock
+ * because only empty groups can be destroyed.
+ */
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(tg->cfs_rq[i]);
list_del_rcu(&tg->list);
list_del_rcu(&tg->siblings);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_group_lock, flags);
@@ -8256,7 +8223,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(shares_mutex);
int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares)
{
int i;
- unsigned long flags;
/*
* We can't change the weight of the root cgroup.
@@ -8273,19 +8239,6 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_g
if (tg->shares == shares)
goto done;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i)
- unregister_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- list_del_rcu(&tg->siblings);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_group_lock, flags);
-
- /* wait for any ongoing reference to this group to finish */
- synchronize_sched();
-
- /*
- * Now we are free to modify the group's share on each cpu
- * w/o tripping rebalance_share or load_balance_fair.
- */
tg->shares = shares;
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
/*
@@ -8294,15 +8247,6 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_g
set_se_shares(tg->se[i], shares);
}
- /*
- * Enable load balance activity on this group, by inserting it back on
- * each cpu's rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i)
- register_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- list_add_rcu(&tg->siblings, &tg->parent->children);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_group_lock, flags);
done:
mutex_unlock(&shares_mutex);
return 0;
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -143,6 +143,23 @@ static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(
return cfs_rq->tg->cfs_rq[this_cpu];
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ if (!cfs_rq->on_list) {
+ list_add_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
+ &rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ cfs_rq->on_list = 1;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ if (cfs_rq->on_list) {
+ list_del_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ cfs_rq->on_list = 0;
+ }
+}
+
/* Iterate thr' all leaf cfs_rq's on a runqueue */
#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list)
@@ -246,6 +263,14 @@ static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(
return &cpu_rq(this_cpu)->cfs;
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+}
+
#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
for (cfs_rq = &rq->cfs; cfs_rq; cfs_rq = NULL)
@@ -648,7 +673,7 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cf
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb)
{
u64 period = sched_avg_period();
u64 now = rq_of(cfs_rq)->clock;
@@ -668,6 +693,11 @@ static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_r
cfs_rq->load_period /= 2;
cfs_rq->load_avg /= 2;
}
+
+ if (lb && !cfs_rq->nr_running) {
+ if (cfs_rq->load_period < (period / 8))
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ }
}
static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
@@ -729,7 +759,7 @@ static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs
reweight_entity(cfs_rq_of(se), se, shares);
}
#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
-static inline void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static inline void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb)
{
}
@@ -859,7 +889,7 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
* Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
*/
update_curr(cfs_rq);
- update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
update_cfs_shares(group_cfs_rq(se));
@@ -873,6 +903,9 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
se->on_rq = 1;
+
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
+ list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
static void __clear_buddies(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
@@ -917,7 +950,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
se->on_rq = 0;
- update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
update_cfs_shares(group_cfs_rq(se));
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -183,6 +183,17 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct
return ktime_to_ns(rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+ list_add_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list,
+ &rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->leaf_rt_rq_list);
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+ list_del_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list);
+}
+
#define for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu(rt_rq, &rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, leaf_rt_rq_list)
@@ -276,6 +287,14 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct
return ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+}
+
#define for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) \
for (rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL)
@@ -825,6 +844,9 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct s
if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running))
return;
+ if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
+ list_add_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq);
+
if (head)
list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
else
@@ -844,6 +866,8 @@ static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct s
__clear_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
dec_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
+ if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
+ list_del_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-28 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-28 22:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Try and make cpu-cgroup suck less Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-28 22:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Rewrite tg_shares_up Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-30 17:20 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-08-30 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-03 3:09 ` Paul Turner
2010-09-03 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-28 22:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-09-03 3:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] sched: On-demand cfs_rq list Paul Turner
2010-09-03 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-28 22:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched: On-demand tg_shares_up() Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-03 1:52 ` Paul Turner
2010-09-03 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100828223547.016319253@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pbourdon@excellency.fr \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.