From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
"r66093@freescale.com" <r66093@freescale.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MMC/SD: add callback function to detect card
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:38:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100831193807.GC7847@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7D56AB.1060307@nokia.com>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:23:23PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Matt Fleming wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:05:13PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:55:09PM +0800, r66093@freescale.com wrote:
> >>>From: Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com>
> >>>
> >>>Add callback function to check if the card has been removed.
> >>>
> >>>in order to check if the card has been removed, the function mmc_send_status will send commad CMD13 to card and ask the card to send its status register to driver, which will generate interrupt repeatly and make the system bad.
> >>>Therefore, get_cd callback is used to detect the card if the driver has.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com>
> >>>---
> >>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 5 ++++-
> >>> drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 5 ++++-
> >>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >>>index 06084db..c5c676d 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >>>@@ -494,7 +494,10 @@ static void mmc_detect(struct mmc_host *host)
> >>> /*
> >>> * Just check if our card has been removed.
> >>> */
> >>>- err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
> >>>+ if (host->ops->get_cd)
> >>>+ err = !host->ops->get_cd(host);
> >>>+ else
> >>>+ err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
> >>> mmc_release_host(host);
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> >>>index cd81c39..3cf1f38 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> >>>@@ -548,7 +548,10 @@ static void mmc_sd_detect(struct mmc_host *host)
> >>> /*
> >>> * Just check if our card has been removed.
> >>> */
> >>>- err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
> >>>+ if (host->ops->get_cd)
> >>>+ err = !host->ops->get_cd(host);
> >>>+ else
> >>>+ err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
> >>> mmc_release_host(host);
> >>>--
> >>>1.6.4
> >>This patchset wasn't replied to -- any comments on it from the list?
> >
> >I think this change makes sense, although it needs to be a bit smarter
> >with error handling because the get_cd() functions can return -ENOSYS if
> >they are not implemented (but the function pointer is still valid).
> >
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > if (host->ops->get_cd) {
> > err = host->ops->get_cd(host);
> > if (err >= 0)
> > err = !err;
> > }
> >
> > if (!host->ops->get_cd || err < 0)
> > err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
> >
> >Thoughts?
>
> I am not sure it won't cause problems.
>
> If you change the card then card detect will return true because
> there is a card but send status will fail because the card is not
> initialised. So the two do not seem equivalent.
Are you sure that the SEND_STATUS will fail if the card hasn't been
initialised? We don't actually look at the response from the SEND_STATUS
command, just whether the command itself failed or succeeded. Even if
the card isn't initialised, the command should succeed. And when we
return from mmc_rescan() we'll initialise the card anyway.
I'm not sure it won't cause problems either and I'd feel a lot more
confident if someone could test it on their hardware though ;-) None of
my boards implement the get_cd function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-31 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-04 7:55 [PATCH 3/3] MMC/SD: add callback function to detect card r66093
2010-01-06 2:40 ` Huang Changming-R66093
2010-08-27 19:05 ` Chris Ball
2010-08-31 19:10 ` Matt Fleming
2010-08-31 19:23 ` Adrian Hunter
2010-08-31 19:38 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2010-08-31 19:40 ` Adrian Hunter
2010-08-31 19:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2010-09-05 21:46 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100831193807.GC7847@console-pimps.org \
--to=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r66093@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.