From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@superonline.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:55:38 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901105232.974F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikXfvEVXEyw_5_eJs2v-3J6Xhd=CT9X-0D+GMCA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi
Thank you for good commenting!
> I don't like use oom_killer_disabled directly.
> That's because we have wrapper inline functions to handle the
> variable(ex, oom_killer_[disable/enable]).
> It means we are reluctant to use the global variable directly.
> So should we make new function as is_oom_killer_disable?
>
> I think NO.
>
> As I read your description, this problem is related to only hibernation.
> Since hibernation freezes all processes(include kswapd), this problem
> happens. Of course, now oom_killer_disabled is used by only
> hibernation. But it can be used others in future(Off-topic : I don't
> want it). Others can use it without freezing processes. Then kswapd
> can set zone->all_unreclaimable and the problem can't happen.
>
> So I want to use sc->hibernation_mode which is already used
> do_try_to_free_pages instead of oom_killer_disabled.
Unfortunatelly, It's impossible. shrink_all_memory() turn on
sc->hibernation_mode. but other hibernation caller merely call
alloc_pages(). so we don't have any hint.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@superonline.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:55:38 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901105232.974F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikXfvEVXEyw_5_eJs2v-3J6Xhd=CT9X-0D+GMCA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi
Thank you for good commenting!
> I don't like use oom_killer_disabled directly.
> That's because we have wrapper inline functions to handle the
> variable(ex, oom_killer_[disable/enable]).
> It means we are reluctant to use the global variable directly.
> So should we make new function as is_oom_killer_disable?
>
> I think NO.
>
> As I read your description, this problem is related to only hibernation.
> Since hibernation freezes all processes(include kswapd), this problem
> happens. Of course, now oom_killer_disabled is used by only
> hibernation. But it can be used others in future(Off-topic : I don't
> want it). Others can use it without freezing processes. Then kswapd
> can set zone->all_unreclaimable and the problem can't happen.
>
> So I want to use sc->hibernation_mode which is already used
> do_try_to_free_pages instead of oom_killer_disabled.
Unfortunatelly, It's impossible. shrink_all_memory() turn on
sc->hibernation_mode. but other hibernation caller merely call
alloc_pages(). so we don't have any hint.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 0:31 [BUGFIX][PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-01 0:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-01 1:45 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-01 1:45 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-01 1:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-09-01 1:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-01 2:01 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-01 2:01 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-01 15:56 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-01 15:56 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-02 0:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-02 0:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-02 2:55 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-02 3:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-02 3:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-02 3:18 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-02 3:18 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901105232.974F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bicave@superonline.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.