All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:21:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100903202101.f937b0bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100904022545.GD705@dastard>

On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:25:45 +1000 Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:

> Still, given the improvements in performance from this patchset,
> I'd say inclusion is a no-braniner....

OK, thanks.

It'd be interesting to check the IPI frequency with and without -
/proc/interrupts "CAL" field.  Presumably it went down a lot.

I wouldn't bust a gut over it though :)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:21:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100903202101.f937b0bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100904022545.GD705@dastard>

On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:25:45 +1000 Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:

> Still, given the improvements in performance from this patchset,
> I'd say inclusion is a no-braniner....

OK, thanks.

It'd be interesting to check the IPI frequency with and without -
/proc/interrupts "CAL" field.  Presumably it went down a lot.

I wouldn't bust a gut over it though :)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-04  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03  9:08 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V4 Mel Gorman
2010-09-03  9:08 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03  9:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: page allocator: Update free page counters after pages are placed on the free list Mel Gorman
2010-09-03  9:08   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 22:38   ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 22:38     ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-05 18:06     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-05 18:06       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03  9:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: page allocator: Calculate a better estimate of NR_FREE_PAGES when memory is low and kswapd is awake Mel Gorman
2010-09-03  9:08   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 22:55   ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 22:55     ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 23:17     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-03 23:17       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-03 23:28       ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 23:28         ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04  0:54         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-04  0:54           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-05 18:12     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-05 18:12       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03  9:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-09-03  9:08   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-03 23:00   ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 23:00     ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04  2:25     ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-04  2:25       ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-04  3:21       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-09-04  3:21         ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04  7:58         ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-04  7:58           ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-04  8:14           ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-04  8:14             ` Dave Chinner
     [not found]             ` <20100905015400.GA10714@localhost>
     [not found]               ` <20100905021555.GG705@dastard>
     [not found]                 ` <20100905060539.GA17450@localhost>
     [not found]                   ` <20100905131447.GJ705@dastard>
2010-09-05 13:45                     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-05 13:45                       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-05 23:33                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-05 23:33                         ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06  4:02                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06  4:02                         ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06  8:40                         ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-06  8:40                           ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-06 21:50                           ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06 21:50                             ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-08  8:49                             ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-08  8:49                               ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-09 12:39                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 12:39                                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-10  6:17                                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-10  6:17                                   ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-07 14:23                         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-07 14:23                           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-08  2:13                           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-08  2:13                             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04  3:23       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04  3:23         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04  3:59         ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04  3:59           ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-04  4:37           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04  4:37             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-05 18:22       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-05 18:22         ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-05 18:14     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-05 18:14       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-08  7:43   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-08  7:43     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-08 20:05     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-08 20:05       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 12:41     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 12:41       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 13:45       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 13:45         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 13:55         ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 13:55           ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 14:32           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 14:32             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-09 15:05             ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-09 15:05               ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-10  2:56               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-10  2:56                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-03 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V4 Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 23:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-21 11:17   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-21 11:17     ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-21 12:58     ` [stable] " Greg KH
2010-09-21 12:58       ` Greg KH
2010-09-21 14:23       ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-21 14:23         ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-23 18:49         ` Greg KH
2010-09-23 18:49           ` Greg KH
2010-09-24  9:14           ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-24  9:14             ` Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-31 17:37 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V3 Mel Gorman
2010-08-31 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-08-31 17:37   ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-31 18:26   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-31 18:26     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-23  8:00 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator V2 Mel Gorman
2010-08-23  8:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-08-23  8:00   ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-23 23:17   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-23 23:17     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-16  9:42 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Reduce watermark-related problems with the per-cpu allocator Mel Gorman
2010-08-16  9:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists after direct reclaim allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-08-16 14:50   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-17  2:57   ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-18  3:02   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-19 14:47   ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-19 15:10     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100903202101.f937b0bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.