From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] lmsensors doesn't detect core-i7 sensors
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:25:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100904142534.GA31566@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <929339.59525.qm@web50002.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Jean,
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 09:49:42AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Guenter,
>
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:32:25 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:56:01AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:26:34 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 04:16:41AM -0400, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> > > > > >sudo /etc/init.d/lm_sensors restart
> > > > >
> > > > > mahmood@localhost:~$<mailto:mahmood@localhost:~$> sudo /etc/init.d/lm-sensors restart
> > > > > .: 39: Can't open /etc/init.d/functions
> > > > >
> > > > > Note there is no lm_sensors. I have lm-sensors
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I tried /etc/init.d/lm-sensors on a lucid (10.04) system and it works for me. It looks like
> > > > you overwrote the original version of /etc/init.d/lm-sensors with prog/init.d/lm_sensors.
> > > > That won't work - prog/init.d/lm_sensors does not work with lucid. You'll need to reinstall
> > > > the original version of /etc/init.d/lm-sensors and try again.
> > >
> > > I proposed once to delete these initialization scripts from our
> > > repository as they are quite distribution specific, but the few votes
> > > were not in my favor.
> > >
> > How about some kind of warning, or at least use different wording in sensors-detect ?
> >
> > The current text is quite absolute ("Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors")
> > and really invites users to overwrite the distribution specific scripts.
>
> Actually it doesn't:
>
> print "Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors\n".
> "for initialization at boot time.\n"
> unless -f "/etc/init.d/lm_sensors";
>
> So the message isn't printed if there is already a script there.
>
> In Mahmood's case, the script is named /etc/init.d/lm-sensors instead,
> so the message would be printed, but running the suggested command
> would _not_ overwrite the file. Not sure what happens where both
> scripts are present though...
>
Problem is two-fold:
1) People will/may remove lm-sensors anyway, being intelligent and assuming
this is what they should do.
2) lm_sensors doesn't work with Ubuntu anyway, since /etc/init.d/functions
does not exist.
> So I would suggest that we simply extend the test to:
>
> unless -f "/etc/init.d/lm_sensors"
> or -f "/etc/init.d/lm-sensors";
>
> Would that be OK with you?
>
Yes.
Another question is if we can get rid of the inclusion of /etc/init.d/functions.
I browsed through the code, but don't immediately see which functions
are used from it, and if they can be replaced. What do you think ?
> If you have a better proposal, I'm listening. The only alternative I
> have in mind is to get rid of the message altogether and delete the
> init script from our repository, leaving integration up to each
> distribution (which at least openSUSE and derivatives already do.)
>
Removing it sounds like overkill to me. After all, it _does_
provide value (when it works). Maybe we should do the above,
and spend some time getting it to work w/ Ubuntu given its
distribution. I should be able to do that.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-04 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 6:38 [lm-sensors] lmsensors doesn't detect core-i7 sensors Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-01 7:19 ` Nikola Pajkovsky
2010-09-01 7:30 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-01 7:38 ` Nikola Pajkovsky
2010-09-01 7:46 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-01 7:53 ` Nikola Pajkovsky
2010-09-01 8:03 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-01 8:11 ` Nikola Pajkovsky
2010-09-01 8:16 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-01 13:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-01 13:56 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-01 14:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-01 14:58 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-01 15:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-01 16:57 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-03 14:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-04 13:49 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-04 14:25 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2010-09-04 14:31 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-04 15:55 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-04 17:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-06 16:18 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-07 1:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-07 8:00 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-13 8:04 ` Mahmood Naderan
2010-09-14 16:20 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100904142534.GA31566@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.