All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: do not use ++ in rcu_dereference() argument
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:50:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100907205015.GJ2448@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009072200.59509.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:00:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 21:21:55 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> > #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
> >         ({ \
> >                 typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
> >                                                                    ^
> >                 rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
> >                 (void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) = p); \
> >                                       ^     ^
> >                 smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
> >                 ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
> >         })
> > 
> > If I understand this, it is evaluated three times, right?
> 
> Yes, that looks like my own fault, I added that :(
> 
> This patch seems to fix it, but I need to think about it some more
> to make sure it still does everything we need.

Let me know when you are satisfied with it, and then I will pick it up.

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 89414d6..743bc3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -313,21 +313,21 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(void);
>  #define __rcu_access_pointer(p, space) \
>  	({ \
>  		typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
> -		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) = p); \
> +		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)NULL) = (typeof(p))NULL); \
>  		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
>  	})
>  #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
>  	({ \
>  		typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
>  		rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
> -		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) = p); \
> +		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)NULL) = (typeof(p))NULL); \
>  		smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
>  		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
>  	})
>  #define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, c, space) \
>  	({ \
>  		rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
> -		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) = p); \
> +		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)NULL) = (typeof(p))NULL); \
>  		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
>  	})
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: do not use ++ in rcu_dereference() argument
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:50:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100907205015.GJ2448@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009072200.59509.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:00:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 21:21:55 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> > #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
> >         ({ \
> >                 typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
> >                                                                    ^
> >                 rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
> >                 (void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) == p); \
> >                                       ^     ^
> >                 smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
> >                 ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
> >         })
> > 
> > If I understand this, it is evaluated three times, right?
> 
> Yes, that looks like my own fault, I added that :(
> 
> This patch seems to fix it, but I need to think about it some more
> to make sure it still does everything we need.

Let me know when you are satisfied with it, and then I will pick it up.

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 89414d6..743bc3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -313,21 +313,21 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(void);
>  #define __rcu_access_pointer(p, space) \
>  	({ \
>  		typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
> -		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) == p); \
> +		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)NULL) == (typeof(p))NULL); \
>  		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
>  	})
>  #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
>  	({ \
>  		typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
>  		rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
> -		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) == p); \
> +		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)NULL) == (typeof(p))NULL); \
>  		smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
>  		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
>  	})
>  #define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, c, space) \
>  	({ \
>  		rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
> -		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) == p); \
> +		(void) (((typeof (*p) space *)NULL) == (typeof(p))NULL); \
>  		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
>  	})
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-07 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-05 18:32 [PATCH] md: do not use ++ in rcu_dereference() argument Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-05 18:32 ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-05 19:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-05 19:01   ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-05 19:01   ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-05 19:23   ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-05 19:23     ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-05 19:23     ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-05 20:39     ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-05 20:39       ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-06  5:29       ` Neil Brown
2010-09-06  5:29         ` Neil Brown
2010-09-06  5:29         ` Neil Brown
2010-09-06  7:43         ` walter harms
2010-09-06  7:43           ` walter harms
2010-09-06 11:05           ` Neil Brown
2010-09-06 11:05             ` Neil Brown
2010-09-06 19:21         ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-06 19:21           ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-08  7:04           ` Neil Brown
2010-09-08  7:04             ` Neil Brown
2010-09-16 12:54         ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-16 12:54           ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-17  3:18           ` Neil Brown
2010-09-17  3:18             ` Neil Brown
2010-09-06 20:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-06 20:10   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-06 20:10   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-07 19:21   ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-07 19:21     ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-07 19:21     ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-09-07 20:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-07 20:00       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-07 20:50       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-09-07 20:50         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-09 15:14         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-09 15:14           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-10  3:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-10  3:46             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-14  0:33             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-14  0:33               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-15 12:28               ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-15 12:28                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-16  6:15                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16  6:15                   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100907205015.GJ2448@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=segooon@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.