Re: [PATCH 0/6] Large scancode handling

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:31:21AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:41:38AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> > 
> > I guess I better get off my behind and commit the changes to support large
> > scancodes, or they will not make to 2.6.37 either... There isn't much
> > changes, except I followed David's suggestion and changed boolean index
> > field into u8 flags field. Still, please glance it over once again and
> > shout if you see something you do not like.
> > 
> > Jiri, how do you want to handle the changes to HID? I could either push
> > them through my tree together with the first patch or you can push through
> > yours once the first change hits mainline.
> > 
> > Mauro, the same question goes for media/IR patch.
> > 
> > David, I suppose you still have the winbond remote so you could test
> > changes to winbond-cir driver.
> 
> This'll be fun. :) David recently posted a patchset that among other
> things, ports winbond-cir over to {ir,rc}-core to the tune of ~700 less
> lines in winbond-cir.c. It also touches a fair amount of core bits, as
> does a patchset posted by Maxim... I suspect this series should probably
> go in first though.
> 

Hmm, the only reason for conversion is that I want to do the back
converstion get/setkeycode_new->get/setkeycode sometimes around
2.6.37-rc2. So it should be perfectly fine for David's changes to go in
and I will just drop my patch completely.

> > Ville, do you still have the hardware to try our ati_remote2 changes?
> 
> If not, I've got the hardware. (Speaking of which, porting ati_remote*
> over to {ir,rc}-core is also on the TODO list, albeit with very very
> low priority at the moment).

Ok, then we'' pencil you in for testing if we do not hear from Ville ;)

-- 
Dmitry