From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>,
Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:37:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100908213740.GA7550@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100907153813.936db0c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:38:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I noticed no throughput drop neither with PIO transfers nor
> > with DMA (tested on MPC8569E CPU), while latencies should be
> > greatly improved.
>
> This patchset isn't causing any problems yet, but may do so in the
> future and will impact the validity of any testing. It seems to be
> kind of stuck. Should I drop it all?
I suggest keeping it -- I'll find time to test it out here soon, and
will keep it in mind as a possible regression cause.
Thanks,
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:37:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100908213740.GA7550@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100907153813.936db0c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:38:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I noticed no throughput drop neither with PIO transfers nor
> > with DMA (tested on MPC8569E CPU), while latencies should be
> > greatly improved.
>
> This patchset isn't causing any problems yet, but may do so in the
> future and will impact the validity of any testing. It seems to be
> kind of stuck. Should I drop it all?
I suggest keeping it -- I'll find time to test it out here soon, and
will keep it in mind as a possible regression cause.
Thanks,
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-08 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-14 13:07 [PATCH 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:07 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] sdhci: Turn timeout timer into delayed work Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:07 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] sdhci: Use work structs instead of tasklets Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:07 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] sdhci: Clear interrupt status register just once Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] sdhci: Use threaded IRQ handler Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] sdhci: Turn host->lock into a mutex Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] sdhci: Get rid of card detect work Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] sdhci: Get rid of mdelay()s where it is safe and makes sense Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] sdhci: Use jiffies instead of a timeout counter Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-15 6:02 ` [PATCH 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context Matt Fleming
2010-07-15 6:02 ` Matt Fleming
2010-07-21 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-21 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-07 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-07 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-08 21:37 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2010-09-08 21:37 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-08 21:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-08 21:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-08 22:05 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-08 22:05 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-08 22:27 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-08 22:27 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-09 2:28 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-09 2:28 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-09 7:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-09 7:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-24 16:00 Jeremie Samuel
2013-06-13 14:23 ` Jeremie Samuel
2013-06-27 14:46 ` Chris Ball
2013-07-09 15:44 Jeremie Samuel
2013-07-09 15:52 ` Philip Rakity
2013-07-11 8:28 ` Jeremie Samuel
2013-10-16 16:20 Jeremie Samuel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100908213740.GA7550@void.printf.net \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=albert_herranz@yahoo.es \
--cc=avorontsov@mvista.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.