From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: error27@gmail.com
Cc: ramkrishna.vepa@exar.com, sivakumar.subramani@exar.com,
sreenivasa.honnur@exar.com, jon.mason@exar.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vxge: potential NULL dereference
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:32:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100910.133255.137830993.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100910115423.GC5959@bicker>
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:54:23 +0200
> At the start of the function we test whether the "vpath" is NULL but we
> need another test here as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> ---
> This is a static checker bug, I'm not sure if we ever pass a NULL
> pointer for "vpath".
I cannot see any case where this can happen. There are two
cases:
1) __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process() is invoked via vxge_hw_device_begin_irq(),
which looks like:
ret = __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process(
&hldev->virtual_paths[i], skip_alarms);
that vpath pointer first argument will never be NULL.
2) __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process() is invoked via vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process()
which uses:
status = __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process(vp->vpath, skip_alarms);
All vpath valid active vpath handles always have a non-NULL vp->vpath
virtual path back pointer, as setup by vxge_hw_vpath_open():
...
vp->vpath = vpath;
...
*vpath_handle = vp;
attr->fifo_attr.userdata = vpath->fifoh;
attr->ring_attr.userdata = vpath->ringh;
return VXGE_HW_OK;
So we can simply remove the first NULL check as this can never actually
be NULL.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: error27@gmail.com
Cc: ramkrishna.vepa@exar.com, sivakumar.subramani@exar.com,
sreenivasa.honnur@exar.com, jon.mason@exar.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vxge: potential NULL dereference
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:32:55 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100910.133255.137830993.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100910115423.GC5959@bicker>
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:54:23 +0200
> At the start of the function we test whether the "vpath" is NULL but we
> need another test here as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> ---
> This is a static checker bug, I'm not sure if we ever pass a NULL
> pointer for "vpath".
I cannot see any case where this can happen. There are two
cases:
1) __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process() is invoked via vxge_hw_device_begin_irq(),
which looks like:
ret = __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process(
&hldev->virtual_paths[i], skip_alarms);
that vpath pointer first argument will never be NULL.
2) __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process() is invoked via vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process()
which uses:
status = __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process(vp->vpath, skip_alarms);
All vpath valid active vpath handles always have a non-NULL vp->vpath
virtual path back pointer, as setup by vxge_hw_vpath_open():
...
vp->vpath = vpath;
...
*vpath_handle = vp;
attr->fifo_attr.userdata = vpath->fifoh;
attr->ring_attr.userdata = vpath->ringh;
return VXGE_HW_OK;
So we can simply remove the first NULL check as this can never actually
be NULL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-10 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 11:54 [patch] vxge: potential NULL dereference Dan Carpenter
2010-09-10 11:54 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-09-10 20:32 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-09-10 20:32 ` David Miller
2010-09-10 21:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-09-10 21:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-09-10 21:32 ` Jon Mason
2010-09-10 21:32 ` Jon Mason
2010-09-10 21:40 ` David Miller
2010-09-10 21:40 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100910.133255.137830993.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=jon.mason@exar.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ramkrishna.vepa@exar.com \
--cc=sivakumar.subramani@exar.com \
--cc=sreenivasa.honnur@exar.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.