From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
To: Artur Skawina <art.08.09@gmail.com>
Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
John Drescher <drescherjm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (HPET)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:36:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100910053601.GA4981@brouette> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C8982EF.8030705@gmail.com>
> On 09/10/10 00:34, Nix wrote:
> > It did: I found a system on which the fault was consistently
> > reproducible. Bisected.
Thanks for doing this! Nice work!
* Artur Skawina <art.08.09@gmail.com> [2010-09-10 02:59]:
> I'm seeing this too, except here it happens every couple of days of uptime,
> lasts for a few minutes, and then goes away. Which made bisecting a bit
> impractical... Thank you for doing it.
> HW is similar; x64 and X58/82801JI/ICH10, tsc clocksrc.
> Did that printk trigger? Empirically confirming that this is the problem
> could take weeks here, as it happens so rarely...
Same here, I have not yet seen the problem with 2.6.35.4 and a max
uptime of 3 or 4 days.
My details are identical: tsc clocksource, x86-64 and X58/82801JI/ICH10.
--
Damien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-10 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-05 0:51 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (ACPI idle?) Nix
2010-09-06 5:32 ` Damien Wyart
2010-09-06 20:27 ` Nix
2010-09-07 5:36 ` Damien Wyart
2010-09-08 21:24 ` Nix
2010-09-08 21:35 ` John Drescher
2010-09-08 22:25 ` Nix
2010-09-09 22:34 ` [BISECTED] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (HPET) Nix
2010-09-09 23:44 ` John Drescher
2010-09-09 23:57 ` Nix
2010-09-10 0:08 ` John Drescher
2010-09-10 0:14 ` John Drescher
2010-09-10 0:59 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-10 5:36 ` Damien Wyart [this message]
2010-09-10 7:42 ` Nix
2010-09-10 7:47 ` Damien Wyart
2010-09-10 8:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-10 9:41 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-09-10 13:22 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-10 20:13 ` Nix
2010-09-10 20:12 ` Nix
2010-09-14 10:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-14 20:17 ` Nix
2010-09-14 22:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-14 22:23 ` Artur Skawina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100910053601.GA4981@brouette \
--to=damien.wyart@free.fr \
--cc=art.08.09@gmail.com \
--cc=drescherjm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.