From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/17] writeback: add trace event for balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:49:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100912155203.668993282@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100912154945.758129106@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-trace-balance_dirty_pages.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5516 bytes --]
Here is an interesting test to verify the theory with balance_dirty_pages()
tracing. On a partition that can do ~60MB/s, a sparse file is created and
4 rsync tasks with different write bandwidth started:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1T bs=1M count=1 seek=1024000
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/balance_dirty_pages/enable
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/a --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/A --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/b --bwlimit 20000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/c --bwlimit 30000&
(btw, is there a dd that can do --bwlimit?
it's a bit twisted to use rsync, or lftp net:limit-rate)
Trace outputs within 0.1 second, grouped by tasks:
rsync-3824 [004] 15002.076447: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% thresh=130876 gap=5340 dirtied=192 pause=20 bw=34855512
rsync-3822 [003] 15002.091701: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% thresh=130777 gap=5113 dirtied=192 pause=20 bw=33419085
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.004667: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% thresh=129570 gap=3714 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=24541625
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.012654: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% thresh=129589 gap=3733 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=24651878
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.021838: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% thresh=129604 gap=3748 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=24768628
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.091193: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% thresh=129583 gap=3983 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=26274370
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.102729: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% thresh=129594 gap=3802 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=25015422
rsync-3821 [000] 15002.109252: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% thresh=129619 gap=3827 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=25179342
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.009029: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128762 gap=2842 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=18885024
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.021598: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128813 gap=3021 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=20088241
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.032973: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128805 gap=2885 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=19146453
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.048800: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128823 gap=2967 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=19673334
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.060728: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128821 gap=3221 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=21362280
rsync-3823 [000] 15002.073152: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128825 gap=3225 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=21385010
rsync-3823 [005] 15002.090111: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128782 gap=3214 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=21333266
rsync-3823 [004] 15002.102520: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128764 gap=3036 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=20104559
The data vividly show that
- the heaviest writer is throttled a bit (weight=39%)
- the lighter writers run at full speed (weight=15%,15%,30%)
rsync is smart enough to compensate for the in-kernel pause time
Don't be confused by the 'bw=' field. It does not take user space
think time into account.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/page-writeback.c | 5 +++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2010-09-07 23:16:28.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2010-09-07 23:20:17.000000000 +0800
@@ -148,11 +148,52 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(wbc_class, name, \
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_start);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_written);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_wait);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_start);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_written);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_wait);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writepage);
+TRACE_EVENT(balance_dirty_pages,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+ unsigned long task_weight,
+ unsigned long bdi_thresh,
+ unsigned long gap,
+ unsigned long bw,
+ unsigned long pages_dirtied,
+ unsigned long pause),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bdi, task_weight, bdi_thresh, gap, bw, pages_dirtied, pause),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array(char, bdi, 32)
+ __field(unsigned long, task_weight)
+ __field(unsigned long, bdi_thresh)
+ __field(unsigned long, gap)
+ __field(unsigned long, bw)
+ __field(unsigned long, pages_dirtied)
+ __field(unsigned long, pause)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ strlcpy(__entry->bdi, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
+ __entry->task_weight = task_weight;
+ __entry->bdi_thresh = bdi_thresh;
+ __entry->gap = gap;
+ __entry->bw = bw;
+ __entry->pages_dirtied = pages_dirtied;
+ __entry->pause = pause * 1000 / HZ;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("bdi=%s weight=%lu%% "
+ "thresh=%lu gap=%lu dirtied=%lu pause=%lu bw=%lu",
+ __entry->bdi,
+ __entry->task_weight,
+ __entry->bdi_thresh,
+ __entry->gap,
+ __entry->pages_dirtied,
+ __entry->pause,
+ __entry->bw
+ )
+);
+
#endif /* _TRACE_WRITEBACK_H */
/* This part must be outside protection */
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2010-09-07 23:20:02.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2010-09-07 23:21:58.000000000 +0800
@@ -536,6 +536,11 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
} else if (pause < HZ/100)
current->nr_dirtied_pause++;
+ trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
+ 100 * numerator / denominator,
+ bdi_thresh, gap, bw,
+ pages_dirtied, pause);
+
__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
io_schedule_timeout(pause);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/17] writeback: add trace event for balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:49:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100912155203.668993282@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100912154945.758129106@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-trace-balance_dirty_pages.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5741 bytes --]
Here is an interesting test to verify the theory with balance_dirty_pages()
tracing. On a partition that can do ~60MB/s, a sparse file is created and
4 rsync tasks with different write bandwidth started:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1T bs=1M count=1 seek=1024000
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/balance_dirty_pages/enable
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/a --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/A --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/b --bwlimit 20000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/c --bwlimit 30000&
(btw, is there a dd that can do --bwlimit?
it's a bit twisted to use rsync, or lftp net:limit-rate)
Trace outputs within 0.1 second, grouped by tasks:
rsync-3824 [004] 15002.076447: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% thresh=130876 gap=5340 dirtied=192 pause=20 bw=34855512
rsync-3822 [003] 15002.091701: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% thresh=130777 gap=5113 dirtied=192 pause=20 bw=33419085
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.004667: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% thresh=129570 gap=3714 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=24541625
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.012654: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% thresh=129589 gap=3733 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=24651878
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.021838: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% thresh=129604 gap=3748 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=24768628
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.091193: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% thresh=129583 gap=3983 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=26274370
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.102729: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% thresh=129594 gap=3802 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=25015422
rsync-3821 [000] 15002.109252: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% thresh=129619 gap=3827 dirtied=64 pause=8 bw=25179342
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.009029: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128762 gap=2842 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=18885024
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.021598: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128813 gap=3021 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=20088241
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.032973: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128805 gap=2885 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=19146453
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.048800: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128823 gap=2967 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=19673334
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.060728: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128821 gap=3221 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=21362280
rsync-3823 [000] 15002.073152: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128825 gap=3225 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=21385010
rsync-3823 [005] 15002.090111: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128782 gap=3214 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=21333266
rsync-3823 [004] 15002.102520: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% thresh=128764 gap=3036 dirtied=64 pause=12 bw=20104559
The data vividly show that
- the heaviest writer is throttled a bit (weight=39%)
- the lighter writers run at full speed (weight=15%,15%,30%)
rsync is smart enough to compensate for the in-kernel pause time
Don't be confused by the 'bw=' field. It does not take user space
think time into account.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/page-writeback.c | 5 +++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2010-09-07 23:16:28.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2010-09-07 23:20:17.000000000 +0800
@@ -148,11 +148,52 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(wbc_class, name, \
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_start);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_written);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_wait);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_start);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_written);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_wait);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writepage);
+TRACE_EVENT(balance_dirty_pages,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+ unsigned long task_weight,
+ unsigned long bdi_thresh,
+ unsigned long gap,
+ unsigned long bw,
+ unsigned long pages_dirtied,
+ unsigned long pause),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bdi, task_weight, bdi_thresh, gap, bw, pages_dirtied, pause),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array(char, bdi, 32)
+ __field(unsigned long, task_weight)
+ __field(unsigned long, bdi_thresh)
+ __field(unsigned long, gap)
+ __field(unsigned long, bw)
+ __field(unsigned long, pages_dirtied)
+ __field(unsigned long, pause)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ strlcpy(__entry->bdi, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
+ __entry->task_weight = task_weight;
+ __entry->bdi_thresh = bdi_thresh;
+ __entry->gap = gap;
+ __entry->bw = bw;
+ __entry->pages_dirtied = pages_dirtied;
+ __entry->pause = pause * 1000 / HZ;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("bdi=%s weight=%lu%% "
+ "thresh=%lu gap=%lu dirtied=%lu pause=%lu bw=%lu",
+ __entry->bdi,
+ __entry->task_weight,
+ __entry->bdi_thresh,
+ __entry->gap,
+ __entry->pages_dirtied,
+ __entry->pause,
+ __entry->bw
+ )
+);
+
#endif /* _TRACE_WRITEBACK_H */
/* This part must be outside protection */
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2010-09-07 23:20:02.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2010-09-07 23:21:58.000000000 +0800
@@ -536,6 +536,11 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
} else if (pause < HZ/100)
current->nr_dirtied_pause++;
+ trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
+ 100 * numerator / denominator,
+ bdi_thresh, gap, bw,
+ pages_dirtied, pause);
+
__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
io_schedule_timeout(pause);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-12 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-12 15:49 [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] soft and dynamic dirty throttling limits Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 01/17] writeback: remove the internal 5% low bound on dirty_ratio Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 9:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-13 9:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-13 9:51 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 9:51 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 9:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 9:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-13 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 02/17] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 8:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-13 8:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-13 11:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 11:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 03/17] writeback: per-task rate limit to balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 04/17] writeback: quit throttling when bdi dirty/writeback pages go down Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 05/17] writeback: quit throttling when signal pending Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 20:46 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-12 20:46 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-13 1:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 1:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 3:21 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-13 3:21 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-13 3:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 3:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 8:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-14 8:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-14 8:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 8:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 8:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-14 8:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-14 9:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 9:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 9:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-14 9:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 06/17] writeback: move task dirty fraction to balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 07/17] writeback: add trace event for balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 08/17] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated written pages Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-14 8:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-14 8:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 09/17] writeback: bdi write bandwidth estimation Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 10/17] writeback: show bdi write bandwidth in debugfs Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 11/17] writeback: make nr_to_write a per-file limit Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 12/17] writeback: scale IO chunk size up to device bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 13/17] writeback: reduce per-bdi dirty threshold ramp up time Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 16:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 16:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 14/17] vmscan: add scan_control.priority Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:50 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm: lower soft dirty limits on memory pressure Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 9:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-13 9:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:50 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm: create /vm/dirty_pressure in debugfs Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:50 ` [PATCH 17/17] writeback: consolidate balance_dirty_pages() variable names Wu Fengguang
2010-09-12 15:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-12 14:17 ` [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] soft and dynamic dirty throttling limits Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-12 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-13 3:07 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-13 3:07 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-13 3:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-13 3:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-13 8:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-13 8:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-13 9:26 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-13 9:26 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-01 6:24 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-01 6:24 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-04 3:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-04 3:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-04 12:48 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-04 12:48 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-04 13:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-04 13:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-05 14:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-05 14:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-06 10:42 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-06 10:42 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-14 13:12 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-14 13:12 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100912155203.668993282@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.