From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Common struct clk implementation, v7
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:51:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100916015105.GC7266@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284530924.3350.7.camel@pororo>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:08:44PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> sh folks: to avoid fragmenting the discussion and filling up everyone's
> inbox I'll refrain from re-posting this series. Patches are here if
> you're interested:
>
> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=jk/dt/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/clk-common
>
I've been passively monitoring these patches as they were going by on
l-k, so there aren't really any surprises here. We'll need to do a bit of
refactoring to start using it once it is merged, but that shouldn't be
too problematic.
Right now we're using a shared clock framework between sh and ARM-based
SH-Mobile CPUs (drivers/sh/clk.c and include/linux/sh_clk.h), so both
should convert fairly easily at the same time.
It also doesn't seem like this really poses any problems or overlap with
Jean-Christophe's work for making the clkdev bits generic, so we should
be able to do both independently. If you haven't seen that, it's
currently pending in the ARM patch tracker:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?idc90/1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Common struct clk implementation, v7
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:51:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100916015105.GC7266@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284530924.3350.7.camel@pororo>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:08:44PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> sh folks: to avoid fragmenting the discussion and filling up everyone's
> inbox I'll refrain from re-posting this series. Patches are here if
> you're interested:
>
> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=jk/dt/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/clk-common
>
I've been passively monitoring these patches as they were going by on
l-k, so there aren't really any surprises here. We'll need to do a bit of
refactoring to start using it once it is merged, but that shouldn't be
too problematic.
Right now we're using a shared clock framework between sh and ARM-based
SH-Mobile CPUs (drivers/sh/clk.c and include/linux/sh_clk.h), so both
should convert fairly easily at the same time.
It also doesn't seem like this really poses any problems or overlap with
Jean-Christophe's work for making the clkdev bits generic, so we should
be able to do both independently. If you haven't seen that, it's
currently pending in the ARM patch tracker:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6390/1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-16 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-15 3:40 [PATCH 0/3] Common struct clk implementation, v7 Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-15 3:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-16 13:09 ` Jassi Brar
2010-09-17 0:24 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-17 0:55 ` Jassi Brar
2010-09-17 2:16 ` Jassi Brar
2010-11-27 15:56 ` Jassi Brar
2010-11-29 7:59 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-12-07 14:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-08 1:02 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-12-08 8:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-08 16:48 ` Ben Dooks
2010-12-09 2:16 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-12-10 15:09 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-11 2:21 ` Jassi Brar
2010-09-15 3:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm/clkdev: Allow common struct clk usage Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-15 3:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-15 5:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] Common struct clk implementation, v7 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-15 5:53 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-15 6:08 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-15 6:08 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-16 1:51 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2010-09-16 1:51 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-15 8:15 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-09-15 23:15 ` Colin Cross
2010-09-15 23:15 ` Colin Cross
2010-09-16 8:19 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-16 8:19 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-09-26 23:57 ` Ben Dooks
2010-09-26 23:57 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100916015105.GC7266@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.