From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scsi_dh_alua: add missing transitioning state support
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:29:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922122901.GA10218@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C99D6B3.3090003@suse.de>
On Wed, Sep 22 2010 at 6:13am -0400,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
> > On 09/21/2010 02:33 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >> 2) the patch also modified alua_rtpg() so implicit ALUA would retry
> >> (just like explicit ALUA currently does) if TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING
> >> - so why should we avoid retry for implicit but do it for explicit?
> >
> > Leaving that for Hannes. I cannot think of a reason. Probably just did
> > not do it.
>
> Finally I got around to answering this.
>
> I've attached a patch which I made the other day which seems to work
> reasonably well.
> Looks better from my side, so if you agree I'll be sending it
> upstream properly.
Looks good for covering this "2)" change above.
But "1)" change you had concern with (in my previous patch) was that
alua_prep_fn would return BLKPREP_DEFER if TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING.
This was bad in that FS requests (like the directio path checker) would
always call ->prep_fn and that if TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING the RTPG
state would never be reevaluated.. leaving us stuck in BLKPREP_DEFER.
Seems I'm missing a new flow that proves this is no longer a concern.
Please advise, thanks.
Mike
> From d3f02c90db3e3177309b78726d082e17dd772ee2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:09:07 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: Handle all states correctly
>
> For ALUA we should be handling all states, independent of whether
> is explicit or implicit. For 'Transitioning' we should be retry
> for a certain amount of time; after that an error should be
> returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> index 1a970a7..c6f57e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
...
> @@ -698,8 +704,11 @@ static int alua_prep_fn(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
> struct alua_dh_data *h = get_alua_data(sdev);
> int ret = BLKPREP_OK;
>
> - if (h->state != TPGS_STATE_OPTIMIZED &&
> - h->state != TPGS_STATE_NONOPTIMIZED) {
> + if (h->state == TPGS_STATE_TRANSITIONING)
> + ret = BLKPREP_DEFER;
> + else if (h->state != TPGS_STATE_OPTIMIZED &&
> + h->state != TPGS_STATE_NONOPTIMIZED &&
> + h->state != TPGS_STATE_LBA_DEPENDENT) {
> ret = BLKPREP_KILL;
> req->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 19:05 [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: add missing transitioning state support Mike Snitzer
2010-08-17 19:23 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-08-30 9:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-08-31 15:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-20 15:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-21 2:27 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-21 2:28 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-21 19:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-21 21:14 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-22 10:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-09-22 12:29 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-09-23 7:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-09-23 13:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-23 18:53 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100922122901.GA10218@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.