From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Har'El <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 21
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:20:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922192038.GK15338@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100922174706.GA18005@redhat.com>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:47:06PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:29:00PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> > In any case, while I obviously agree that it's your prerogative not to merge
> > code that you consider ugly, I still don't see any particular problem to start
> > with the current, working, code, and fix it later. It's not like we can never
> > change this code after it's in - it's clearly marked with if(nested) and
> > doesn't effect anything in the non-nested path.
> >
> After code it merged there is much less incentive to change things
> drastically.
I think nested svm is a good counter example to that. It has drastically
improved since it was merged. Ok, it hasn't _changed_ drastically, but
what drastic changes do we expect to become necessary in the nested-vmx
code?
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-21 18:05 KVM call minutes for Sept 21 Chris Wright
2010-09-21 18:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Chris Wright
2010-09-21 18:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-09-21 18:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-09-22 0:04 ` Nadav Har'El
2010-09-22 1:48 ` Chris Wright
2010-09-22 17:49 ` Nadav Har'El
2010-09-22 18:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-09-22 19:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-09-22 19:48 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-09-22 9:02 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-09-22 16:29 ` Nadav Har'El
2010-09-22 17:47 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-09-22 19:20 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-09-22 20:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-09-22 23:00 ` Nadav Har'El
2010-09-26 14:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-26 20:25 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-09-27 8:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-27 14:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-09-27 14:22 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-26 13:27 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-26 14:28 ` Nadav Har'El
2010-09-26 14:50 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100922192038.GK15338@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nyh@math.technion.ac.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.