* [PATCH 0/2] mmc_test performance test fixes
@ 2010-09-23 11:51 Adrian Hunter
2010-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits Adrian Hunter
2010-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc_test: fix display of .5 KiB Adrian Hunter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2010-09-23 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Ball; +Cc: linux-mmc Mailing List, Adrian Hunter
Hi
Here are two fixes for mmc_test performance tests. They apply to the mmc-next
branch of Chris Ball's mmc tree at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git
The following changes since commit 0bff5cae99dfc9f820cdbddcc4f2cf55627ccfac:
Philip Rakity (1):
mmc: sdhci: print out controller name for register debug
Adrian Hunter (2):
mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits
mmc_test: fix display of .5 KiB
drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Regards
Adrian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits
2010-09-23 11:51 [PATCH 0/2] mmc_test performance test fixes Adrian Hunter
@ 2010-09-23 11:51 ` Adrian Hunter
2010-09-24 21:15 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc_test: fix display of .5 KiB Adrian Hunter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2010-09-23 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Ball; +Cc: linux-mmc Mailing List, Adrian Hunter
>From aad98716cd9e8f83831721010d58d2a9f8ea2d2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:55:15 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits
Correctly allocate memory to meet the host controller
driver's maximum segment size and count limits.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
---
drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
index 6580af7..5874040 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
@@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
if (max_page_cnt > limit)
max_page_cnt = limit;
- if (max_page_cnt < min_page_cnt)
- max_page_cnt = min_page_cnt;
+ if (min_page_cnt > max_page_cnt)
+ min_page_cnt = max_page_cnt;
if (max_seg_page_cnt > max_page_cnt)
max_seg_page_cnt = max_page_cnt;
@@ -359,13 +359,13 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
mem->cnt += 1;
if (max_page_cnt <= (1UL << order))
break;
+ max_page_cnt -= 1UL << order;
+ page_cnt += 1UL << order;
if (mem->cnt >= max_segs) {
if (page_cnt < min_page_cnt)
goto out_free;
break;
}
- max_page_cnt -= 1UL << order;
- page_cnt += 1UL << order;
}
return mem;
@@ -1470,12 +1470,12 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card *test, int erase, int fill)
t->max_tfr = t->max_segs * t->max_seg_sz;
/*
- * Try to allocate enough memory for the whole area. Less is OK
+ * Try to allocate enough memory for a max. sized transfer. Less is OK
* because the same memory can be mapped into the scatterlist more than
* once. Also, take into account the limits imposed on scatterlist
* segments by the host driver.
*/
- t->mem = mmc_test_alloc_mem(min_sz, t->max_sz, t->max_segs,
+ t->mem = mmc_test_alloc_mem(min_sz, t->max_tfr, t->max_segs,
t->max_seg_sz);
if (!t->mem)
return -ENOMEM;
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] mmc_test: fix display of .5 KiB
2010-09-23 11:51 [PATCH 0/2] mmc_test performance test fixes Adrian Hunter
2010-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits Adrian Hunter
@ 2010-09-23 11:51 ` Adrian Hunter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2010-09-23 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Ball; +Cc: linux-mmc Mailing List, Adrian Hunter
>From 676448f4d2623103cc5a4d246afe9ce32b7f339d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:08:21 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mmc_test: fix display of .5 KiB
Append .5 to KiB display when there are an odd number of
sectors.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
---
drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
index 5874040..c38a3a8 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static void mmc_test_print_rate(struct mmc_test_card *test, uint64_t bytes,
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Transfer of %u sectors (%u%s KiB) took %lu.%09lu "
"seconds (%u kB/s, %u KiB/s)\n",
mmc_hostname(test->card->host), sectors, sectors >> 1,
- (sectors == 1 ? ".5" : ""), (unsigned long)ts.tv_sec,
+ (sectors & 1 ? ".5" : ""), (unsigned long)ts.tv_sec,
(unsigned long)ts.tv_nsec, rate / 1000, rate / 1024);
mmc_test_save_transfer_result(test, 1, sectors, ts, rate);
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static void mmc_test_print_avg_rate(struct mmc_test_card *test, uint64_t bytes,
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Transfer of %u x %u sectors (%u x %u%s KiB) took "
"%lu.%09lu seconds (%u kB/s, %u KiB/s)\n",
mmc_hostname(test->card->host), count, sectors, count,
- sectors >> 1, (sectors == 1 ? ".5" : ""),
+ sectors >> 1, (sectors & 1 ? ".5" : ""),
(unsigned long)ts.tv_sec, (unsigned long)ts.tv_nsec,
rate / 1000, rate / 1024);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits
2010-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits Adrian Hunter
@ 2010-09-24 21:15 ` Chris Ball
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ball @ 2010-09-24 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Hunter; +Cc: linux-mmc Mailing List
Hi Adrian,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:51:29PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:55:15 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits
>
> Correctly allocate memory to meet the host controller
> driver's maximum segment size and count limits.
Thanks very much, this fixes my problems. I've pushed it to mmc-next.
Output below, just in case you're curious:
mmc_test mmc0:e624: Card claimed for testing.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 1. Basic write (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 2. Basic read (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 3. Basic write (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 4. Basic read (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 5. Multi-block write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 6. Multi-block read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 7. Power of two block writes...
mmc0: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 8. Power of two block reads...
mmc0: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 9. Weird sized block writes...
mmc0: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 10. Weird sized block reads...
mmc0: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 11. Badly aligned write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 12. Badly aligned read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 13. Badly aligned multi-block write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 14. Badly aligned multi-block read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 15. Correct xfer_size at write (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 16. Correct xfer_size at read (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 17. Correct xfer_size at write (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 18. Correct xfer_size at read (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 19. Highmem write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 20. Highmem read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 21. Multi-block highmem write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 22. Multi-block highmem read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 23. Best-case read performance...
mmc0: Transfer of 1024 sectors (512 KiB) took 0.033058904 seconds (15859 kB/s, 15487 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 24. Best-case write performance...
mmc0: Transfer of 1024 sectors (512 KiB) took 0.036752587 seconds (14265 kB/s, 13930 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 25. Best-case read performance into scattered pages...
mmc0: Transfer of 8 sectors (4 KiB) took 0.000796178 seconds (5144 kB/s, 5024 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 26. Best-case write performance from scattered pages...
mmc0: Transfer of 8 sectors (4 KiB) took 0.002371540 seconds (1727 kB/s, 1686 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 27. Single read performance by transfer size...
mmc0: Transfer of 1 sectors (0.5 KiB) took 0.000551456 seconds (928 kB/s, 906 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 2 sectors (1 KiB) took 0.000552924 seconds (1851 kB/s, 1808 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 4 sectors (2 KiB) took 0.000668650 seconds (3062 kB/s, 2991 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 8 sectors (4 KiB) took 0.000696796 seconds (5878 kB/s, 5740 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 16 sectors (8 KiB) took 0.001019670 seconds (8033 kB/s, 7845 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 32 sectors (16 KiB) took 0.001567431 seconds (10452 kB/s, 10207 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 64 sectors (32 KiB) took 0.002722948 seconds (12034 kB/s, 11751 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 128 sectors (64 KiB) took 0.004737135 seconds (13834 kB/s, 13510 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 256 sectors (128 KiB) took 0.008854402 seconds (14803 kB/s, 14456 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 512 sectors (256 KiB) took 0.016952058 seconds (15463 kB/s, 15101 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 1024 sectors (512 KiB) took 0.033126787 seconds (15826 kB/s, 15455 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 28. Single write performance by transfer size...
mmc0: Transfer of 1 sectors (0.5 KiB) took 0.001949055 seconds (262 kB/s, 256 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 2 sectors (1 KiB) took 0.002415603 seconds (423 kB/s, 413 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 4 sectors (2 KiB) took 0.002114501 seconds (968 kB/s, 945 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 8 sectors (4 KiB) took 0.001552827 seconds (2637 kB/s, 2575 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 16 sectors (8 KiB) took 0.001740555 seconds (4706 kB/s, 4596 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 32 sectors (16 KiB) took 0.002272057 seconds (7211 kB/s, 7042 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 64 sectors (32 KiB) took 0.003499233 seconds (9364 kB/s, 9144 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 128 sectors (64 KiB) took 0.005615027 seconds (11671 kB/s, 11397 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 256 sectors (128 KiB) took 0.009879663 seconds (13266 kB/s, 12955 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 512 sectors (256 KiB) took 0.173152083 seconds (1513 kB/s, 1478 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 1024 sectors (512 KiB) took 0.036976626 seconds (14178 kB/s, 13846 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 29. Single trim performance by transfer size...
mmc0: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 30. Consecutive read performance by transfer size...
mmc0: Transfer of 8192 x 1 sectors (8192 x 0.5 KiB) took 3.003465917 seconds (1396 kB/s, 1363 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 4096 x 2 sectors (4096 x 1 KiB) took 1.941040090 seconds (2160 kB/s, 2110 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 2048 x 4 sectors (2048 x 2 KiB) took 1.056346906 seconds (3970 kB/s, 3877 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 1024 x 8 sectors (1024 x 4 KiB) took 0.670899009 seconds (6251 kB/s, 6105 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 512 x 16 sectors (512 x 8 KiB) took 0.496233273 seconds (8452 kB/s, 8254 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 256 x 32 sectors (256 x 16 KiB) took 0.383516832 seconds (10936 kB/s, 10680 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 128 x 64 sectors (128 x 32 KiB) took 0.323005936 seconds (12985 kB/s, 12680 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 64 x 128 sectors (64 x 64 KiB) took 0.291171741 seconds (14404 kB/s, 14067 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 32 x 256 sectors (32 x 128 KiB) took 0.275758964 seconds (15210 kB/s, 14853 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 16 x 512 sectors (16 x 256 KiB) took 0.268021558 seconds (15649 kB/s, 15282 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 8 x 1024 sectors (8 x 512 KiB) took 0.264064314 seconds (15883 kB/s, 15511 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 31. Consecutive write performance by transfer size...
mmc0: Transfer of 8192 x 1 sectors (8192 x 0.5 KiB) took 11.873861873 seconds (353 kB/s, 344 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 4096 x 2 sectors (4096 x 1 KiB) took 6.859102388 seconds (611 kB/s, 597 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 2048 x 4 sectors (2048 x 2 KiB) took 3.290696395 seconds (1274 kB/s, 1244 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 1024 x 8 sectors (1024 x 4 KiB) took 1.475266866 seconds (2843 kB/s, 2776 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 512 x 16 sectors (512 x 8 KiB) took 0.822344533 seconds (5100 kB/s, 4980 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 256 x 32 sectors (256 x 16 KiB) took 0.545847885 seconds (7684 kB/s, 7503 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 128 x 64 sectors (128 x 32 KiB) took 0.414100853 seconds (10128 kB/s, 9891 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 64 x 128 sectors (64 x 64 KiB) took 0.340080041 seconds (12333 kB/s, 12044 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 32 x 256 sectors (32 x 128 KiB) took 0.305309179 seconds (13737 kB/s, 13415 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 16 x 512 sectors (16 x 256 KiB) took 0.287391903 seconds (14594 kB/s, 14252 KiB/s)
mmc0: Transfer of 8 x 1024 sectors (8 x 512 KiB) took 0.279981325 seconds (14980 kB/s, 14629 KiB/s)
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Tests completed.
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 32. Consecutive trim performance by transfer size...
mmc0: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)
mmc0: Tests completed.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-24 21:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-23 11:51 [PATCH 0/2] mmc_test performance test fixes Adrian Hunter
2010-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc_test: fix memory allocation segment limits Adrian Hunter
2010-09-24 21:15 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc_test: fix display of .5 KiB Adrian Hunter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.