From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Márton Németh" <nm127@freemail.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Ian Kent" <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] autofs: Only declare function when CONFIG_COMPAT is defined
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009251755.57690.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285334543-7074-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Friday 24 September 2010 15:22:22 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> From: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>
>
> The patch solves the following warnings message when CONFIG_COMPAT
> is not defined:
>
> fs/autofs/root.c:30: warning: ‘autofs_root_compat_ioctl’ declared ‘static’ but never defined
>
> Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
My initial reaction was to put these into my bkl/vfs tree, but then I noticed
that they are against a 2.6.36 bug. Who's taking care of getting them upstream?
- Ian (maintainer)
- Arnd (who wrote the broken patch to start with)
- Frederic (who pushed the broken patch to Linus)
- Andrew (took them into -mm)
I don't care either way, just trying to make sure it gets there and we don't
all submit the same patch simultaneously.
The current state is annoying but harmless, so I could also just add the
patches to my 2.6.37 queue, which already has autofs patches for the BKL.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-25 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-24 13:22 [PATCH 1/2] autofs: Only declare function when CONFIG_COMPAT is defined Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-24 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] autofs4: " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-25 15:55 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-09-26 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] autofs: " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-27 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-04 8:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-30 20:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-09-30 20:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-30 20:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009251755.57690.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm127@freemail.hu \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.