All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
@ 2010-09-24 14:53 Mike Pithouse
  2010-09-24 15:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pithouse @ 2010-09-24 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

Hi all,

 

Is is possible to set an ath9k-based access point's Modulation scheme
using iw or similar?

 

For example:

 

DSSS or OFDM

64QAM, 16QAM,QPSK,BPSK

 

Thanks in advance, Mike.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20100924/dc0e2b4a/attachment.html 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-24 14:53 [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k Mike Pithouse
@ 2010-09-24 15:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  2010-09-28 10:39   ` Mike Pithouse
  2010-09-30 17:26   ` Mike Pithouse
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-09-24 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Mike Pithouse
<mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Is is possible to set an ath9k-based access point?s Modulation scheme using
> iw or similar?

iw dev <devname> set bitrates [legacy-<2.4|5> <legacy rate in Mbps>*]

  Luis

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-24 15:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-09-28 10:39   ` Mike Pithouse
  2010-09-28 18:07     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  2010-09-30 17:26   ` Mike Pithouse
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pithouse @ 2010-09-28 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

Hi Luis,

I have version 0.9.20 of iw (which I thought was the latest) and I don't seem to have a bitrates option.

Is there a more recent version I should be using?

Thanks, Mike.



-----Original Message-----
From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof at gmail.com] 
Sent: 24 September 2010 16:45
To: Mike Pithouse
Cc: ath9k-devel at venema.h4ckr.net
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Mike Pithouse
<mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Is is possible to set an ath9k-based access point?s Modulation scheme using
> iw or similar?

iw dev <devname> set bitrates [legacy-<2.4|5> <legacy rate in Mbps>*]

  Luis

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-28 10:39   ` Mike Pithouse
@ 2010-09-28 18:07     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-09-28 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 03:39:22AM -0700, Mike Pithouse wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> I have version 0.9.20 of iw (which I thought was the latest) and I don't seem to have a bitrates option.
> 
> Is there a more recent version I should be using?

http://wireless.kernel.org/download/iw/iw-0.9.21.tar.bz2

  Luis

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-24 15:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  2010-09-28 10:39   ` Mike Pithouse
@ 2010-09-30 17:26   ` Mike Pithouse
  2010-09-30 17:33       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pithouse @ 2010-09-30 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

Just the ticket - thank you.

I see there's currently some 'inactive' code that will allow the same command to be used to set the MCS index.

Do you know when/if this code will be available?  Alternatively, is there another method currently available to set MCS index?

Thanks, Mike.



-----Original Message-----
From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof at gmail.com] 
Sent: 24 September 2010 16:45
To: Mike Pithouse
Cc: ath9k-devel at venema.h4ckr.net
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Mike Pithouse
<mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Is is possible to set an ath9k-based access point?s Modulation scheme using
> iw or similar?

iw dev <devname> set bitrates [legacy-<2.4|5> <legacy rate in Mbps>*]

  Luis

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-30 17:26   ` Mike Pithouse
@ 2010-09-30 17:33       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-09-30 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Mike Pithouse
<mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> Just the ticket - thank you.
>
> I see there's currently some 'inactive' code that will allow the same command to be used to set the MCS index.
>
> Do you know when/if this code will be available? ?Alternatively, is there another method currently available to set MCS index?

Johannes, is this a TODO still?

  Luis

> Thanks, Mike.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof at gmail.com]
> Sent: 24 September 2010 16:45
> To: Mike Pithouse
> Cc: ath9k-devel at venema.h4ckr.net
> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Mike Pithouse
> <mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Is is possible to set an ath9k-based access point?s Modulation scheme using
>> iw or similar?
>
> iw dev <devname> set bitrates [legacy-<2.4|5> <legacy rate in Mbps>*]
>
> ?Luis
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
@ 2010-09-30 17:33       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-09-30 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Pithouse, Johannes Berg; +Cc: ath9k-devel, linux-wireless

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Mike Pithouse
<mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> Just the ticket - thank you.
>
> I see there's currently some 'inactive' code that will allow the same command to be used to set the MCS index.
>
> Do you know when/if this code will be available?  Alternatively, is there another method currently available to set MCS index?

Johannes, is this a TODO still?

  Luis

> Thanks, Mike.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof@gmail.com]
> Sent: 24 September 2010 16:45
> To: Mike Pithouse
> Cc: ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net
> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Mike Pithouse
> <mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Is is possible to set an ath9k-based access point’s Modulation scheme using
>> iw or similar?
>
> iw dev <devname> set bitrates [legacy-<2.4|5> <legacy rate in Mbps>*]
>
>  Luis
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-30 17:33       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-09-30 17:36         ` Johannes Berg
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2010-09-30 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:33 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Mike Pithouse
> <mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> > Just the ticket - thank you.
> >
> > I see there's currently some 'inactive' code that will allow the same command to be used to set the MCS index.
> >
> > Do you know when/if this code will be available?  Alternatively, is there another method currently available to set MCS index?
> 
> Johannes, is this a TODO still?

You can only do legacy right now, we don't have the
nl80211/cfg80211/mac80211 infrastructure in place for it at this point.

johannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
@ 2010-09-30 17:36         ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2010-09-30 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: Mike Pithouse, ath9k-devel, linux-wireless

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:33 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Mike Pithouse
> <mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> > Just the ticket - thank you.
> >
> > I see there's currently some 'inactive' code that will allow the same command to be used to set the MCS index.
> >
> > Do you know when/if this code will be available?  Alternatively, is there another method currently available to set MCS index?
> 
> Johannes, is this a TODO still?

You can only do legacy right now, we don't have the
nl80211/cfg80211/mac80211 infrastructure in place for it at this point.

johannes


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-30 17:36         ` Johannes Berg
@ 2010-10-01  8:55           ` Mike Pithouse
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pithouse @ 2010-10-01  8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

OK.

Is there any other way to achieve this?  I need to do some testing for each MCS index.  It doesn't need to be elegant!  We can code something up if we have some pointers.

Cheers, Mike.



-----Original Message-----
From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johannes at sipsolutions.net] 
Sent: 30 September 2010 18:37
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Mike Pithouse; ath9k-devel at venema.h4ckr.net; linux-wireless
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:33 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Mike Pithouse
> <mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> > Just the ticket - thank you.
> >
> > I see there's currently some 'inactive' code that will allow the same command to be used to set the MCS index.
> >
> > Do you know when/if this code will be available?  Alternatively, is there another method currently available to set MCS index?
> 
> Johannes, is this a TODO still?

You can only do legacy right now, we don't have the
nl80211/cfg80211/mac80211 infrastructure in place for it at this point.

johannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* RE: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
@ 2010-10-01  8:55           ` Mike Pithouse
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pithouse @ 2010-10-01  8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg, Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: ath9k-devel, linux-wireless
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^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-09-30 17:36         ` Johannes Berg
@ 2010-10-04 15:41           ` Mike Pithouse
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pithouse @ 2010-10-04 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

Hi,

Is anyone able to confirm whether or not it's possible (by any means) to set the MCS Index for an ath9k Access Point?

Thanks, Mike.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Pithouse 
Sent: 01 October 2010 09:55
To: 'Johannes Berg'; Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: ath9k-devel at venema.h4ckr.net; linux-wireless
Subject: RE: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k

OK.

Is there any other way to achieve this?  I need to do some testing for each MCS index.  It doesn't need to be elegant!  We can code something up if we have some pointers.

Cheers, Mike.



-----Original Message-----
From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johannes at sipsolutions.net] 
Sent: 30 September 2010 18:37
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Mike Pithouse; ath9k-devel at venema.h4ckr.net; linux-wireless
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:33 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Mike Pithouse
> <mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> > Just the ticket - thank you.
> >
> > I see there's currently some 'inactive' code that will allow the same command to be used to set the MCS index.
> >
> > Do you know when/if this code will be available?  Alternatively, is there another method currently available to set MCS index?
> 
> Johannes, is this a TODO still?

You can only do legacy right now, we don't have the
nl80211/cfg80211/mac80211 infrastructure in place for it at this point.

johannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* RE: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
@ 2010-10-04 15:41           ` Mike Pithouse
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pithouse @ 2010-10-04 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg, Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: ath9k-devel, linux-wireless
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^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
  2010-10-04 15:41           ` Mike Pithouse
@ 2010-10-04 15:59             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-10-04 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mike Pithouse
<mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone able to confirm whether or not it's possible (by any means) to set the MCS Index for an ath9k Access Point?

Please learn to bottom post:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting

Then you already had an answer to your question but you keep on
asking. The answer was we need API for this which is not present yet.
If you want to hack something around you can go ahead and try using
debugfs on ath9k.

  Luis

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k
@ 2010-10-04 15:59             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-10-04 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Pithouse; +Cc: Johannes Berg, ath9k-devel, linux-wireless

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mike Pithouse
<mike.pithouse@vegastream.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone able to confirm whether or not it's possible (by any means) to set the MCS Index for an ath9k Access Point?

Please learn to bottom post:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting

Then you already had an answer to your question but you keep on
asking. The answer was we need API for this which is not present yet.
If you want to hack something around you can go ahead and try using
debugfs on ath9k.

  Luis

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-04 16:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-24 14:53 [ath9k-devel] Modulation schemes on ath9k Mike Pithouse
2010-09-24 15:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-09-28 10:39   ` Mike Pithouse
2010-09-28 18:07     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-09-30 17:26   ` Mike Pithouse
2010-09-30 17:33     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-09-30 17:33       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-09-30 17:36       ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-30 17:36         ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-01  8:55         ` Mike Pithouse
2010-10-01  8:55           ` Mike Pithouse
2010-10-04 15:41         ` Mike Pithouse
2010-10-04 15:41           ` Mike Pithouse
2010-10-04 15:59           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-10-04 15:59             ` Luis R. Rodriguez

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.