* [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for max6695
@ 2010-09-16 1:52 Guenter Roeck
2010-10-06 16:19 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for Jean Delvare
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-09-16 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
---
Documentation/hwmon/lm90 | 17 +++
drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 4 +-
drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/lm90 b/Documentation/hwmon/lm90
index bc2c2b4..6e963b6 100644
--- a/Documentation/hwmon/lm90
+++ b/Documentation/hwmon/lm90
@@ -84,6 +84,17 @@ Supported chips:
Addresses scanned: I2C 0x4c
Datasheet: Publicly available at the Maxim website
http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/3500
+ * Maxim MAX6695
+ Prefix: 'max6695'
+ Addresses scanned: I2C 0x18
+ Datasheet: Publicly available at the Maxim website
+ http://www.maxim-ic.com/datasheet/index.mvp/id/4199
+ * Maxim MAX6696
+ Prefix: 'max6695'
+ Addresses scanned: I2C 0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x29, 0x2a, 0x2b,
+ 0x4c, 0x4d and 0x4e
+ Datasheet: Publicly available at the Maxim website
+ http://www.maxim-ic.com/datasheet/index.mvp/id/4199
* Winbond/Nuvoton W83L771AWG/ASG
Prefix: 'w83l771'
Addresses scanned: I2C 0x4c
@@ -152,6 +163,12 @@ MAX6680 and MAX6681:
* Selectable address
* Remote sensor type selection
+MAX6695 and MAX6696:
+ * Better local resolution
+ * Selectable address (max6696)
+ * Second critical temperature limit
+ * Two remote sensors
+
W83L771AWG/ASG
* The AWG and ASG variants only differ in package format.
* Filter and alert configuration register at 0xBF
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
index 4d4d09b..17c719b 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
@@ -605,8 +605,8 @@ config SENSORS_LM90
If you say yes here you get support for National Semiconductor LM90,
LM86, LM89 and LM99, Analog Devices ADM1032 and ADT7461, Maxim
MAX6646, MAX6647, MAX6648, MAX6649, MAX6657, MAX6658, MAX6659,
- MAX6680, MAX6681 and MAX6692, and Winbond/Nuvoton W83L771AWG/ASG
- sensor chips.
+ MAX6680, MAX6681, MAX6692, MAX6695, MAX6696, and Winbond/Nuvoton
+ W83L771AWG/ASG sensor chips.
This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
will be called lm90.
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
index de54481..366bb62 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
* chips. The MAX6680 and MAX6681 only differ in the pinout so they can
* be treated identically.
*
+ * This driver also supports the MAX6695 and MAX6696, two other sensor
+ * chips made by Maxim. These are also quite similar to other Maxim
+ * chips, but support three temperature sensors instead of two. MAX6695
+ * and MAX6696 only differ in the pinout so they can be treated identically.
+ *
* This driver also supports the ADT7461 chip from Analog Devices.
* It's supported in both compatibility and extended mode. It is mostly
* compatible with LM90 except for a data format difference for the
@@ -96,7 +101,7 @@ static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = {
0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x29, 0x2a, 0x2b, 0x4c, 0x4d, 0x4e, I2C_CLIENT_END };
enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
- max6646, w83l771 };
+ max6646, w83l771, max6696 };
/*
* The LM90 registers
@@ -137,9 +142,10 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
#define LM90_REG_R_TCRIT_HYST 0x21
#define LM90_REG_W_TCRIT_HYST 0x21
-/* MAX6646/6647/6649/6657/6658/6659 registers */
+/* MAX6646/6647/6649/6657/6658/6659/6695/6696 registers */
#define MAX6657_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMPL 0x11
+#define MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2 0x12
#define MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG 0x16
#define MAX6659_REG_W_REMOTE_EMERG 0x16
#define MAX6659_REG_R_LOCAL_EMERG 0x17
@@ -154,6 +160,8 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
#define LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT (1 << 2) /* extended local temperature */
#define LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT (1 << 3) /* extended remote limit */
#define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY (1 << 4) /* 3rd upper (emergency) limit */
+#define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM (1 << 5)/* emergency alarm */
+#define LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 (1 << 6) /* 3rd temperature sensor */
/*
* Functions declaration
@@ -166,6 +174,9 @@ static void lm90_init_client(struct i2c_client *client);
static void lm90_alert(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned int flag);
static int lm90_remove(struct i2c_client *client);
static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev);
+static inline void lm90_select_remote_channel(struct i2c_client *client,
+ struct lm90_data *data,
+ int channel);
/*
* Driver data (common to all clients)
@@ -186,6 +197,8 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm90_id[] = {
{ "max6659", max6659 },
{ "max6680", max6680 },
{ "max6681", max6680 },
+ { "max6695", max6696 },
+ { "max6696", max6696 },
{ "w83l771", w83l771 },
{ }
};
@@ -217,22 +230,29 @@ struct lm90_data {
int flags;
u8 config_orig; /* Original configuration register value */
- u8 alert_alarms; /* Which alarm bits trigger ALERT# */
+ u16 alert_alarms; /* Which alarm bits trigger ALERT# */
+ /* Upper 8 bits for max6695/96 */
/* registers values */
- s8 temp8[6]; /* 0: local low limit
+ s8 temp8[8]; /* 0: local low limit
1: local high limit
2: local critical limit
3: remote critical limit
- 4: local emergency limit (max6659 only)
- 5: remote emergency limit (max6659 only) */
- s16 temp11[5]; /* 0: remote input
+ 4: local emergency limit (max6659 and max6695/96)
+ 5: remote emergency limit (max6659 and max6695/96)
+ 6: remote 2 critical limit (max6695/96 only)
+ 7: remote 2 emergency limit (max6695/96 only) */
+ s16 temp11[8]; /* 0: remote input
1: remote low limit
2: remote high limit
- 3: remote offset (except max6646 and max6657/58/59)
- 4: local input */
+ 3: remote offset (except max6646, max6657/58/59,
+ and max6695/96)
+ 4: local input
+ 5: remote 2 input (max6695/96 only)
+ 6: remote 2 low limit (max6695/96 only)
+ 7: remote 2 high limit (ma6695/96 only) */
u8 temp_hyst;
- u8 alarms; /* bitvector */
+ u16 alarms; /* bitvector (upper 8 bits for max6695/96) */
};
/*
@@ -390,13 +410,15 @@ static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- static const u8 reg[6] = {
+ static const u8 reg[8] = {
LM90_REG_W_LOCAL_LOW,
LM90_REG_W_LOCAL_HIGH,
LM90_REG_W_LOCAL_CRIT,
LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_CRIT,
MAX6659_REG_W_LOCAL_EMERG,
MAX6659_REG_W_REMOTE_EMERG,
+ LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_CRIT,
+ MAX6659_REG_W_REMOTE_EMERG,
};
struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
@@ -421,7 +443,11 @@ static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8(val);
else
data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_s8(val);
+
+ lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, nr >= 6);
i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[nr], data->temp8[nr]);
+ lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
+
mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
return count;
}
@@ -453,10 +479,13 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
struct {
u8 high;
u8 low;
- } reg[3] = {
- { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_LOWH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_LOWL },
- { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHL },
- { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_OFFSH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_OFFSL }
+ int channel;
+ } reg[5] = {
+ { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_LOWH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_LOWL, 0 },
+ { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHL, 0 },
+ { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_OFFSH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_OFFSL, 0 },
+ { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_LOWH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_LOWL, 1 },
+ { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHL, 1 }
};
struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
@@ -485,11 +514,14 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
else
data->temp11[index] = temp_to_s8(val) << 8;
+ lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, reg[nr].channel);
i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[nr].high,
data->temp11[index] >> 8);
if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT)
i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[nr].low,
data->temp11[index] & 0xff);
+ lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
+
mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
return count;
}
@@ -643,6 +675,62 @@ static const struct attribute_group lm90_emergency_group = {
.attrs = lm90_emergency_attributes,
};
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_emergency_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 15);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_emergency_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 13);
+
+static struct attribute *lm90_emergency_alarm_attributes[] = {
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_emergency_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_emergency_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
+ NULL
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group lm90_emergency_alarm_group = {
+ .attrs = lm90_emergency_alarm_attributes,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Additional attributes for devices with 3 temperature sensors
+ */
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2(temp3_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp11, NULL, 0, 5);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2(temp3_min, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_temp11,
+ set_temp11, 3, 6);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_2(temp3_max, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_temp11,
+ set_temp11, 4, 7);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_crit, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_temp8,
+ set_temp8, 6);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_crit_hyst, S_IRUGO, show_temphyst, NULL, 6);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_emergency, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_temp8,
+ set_temp8, 7);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_emergency_hyst, S_IRUGO, show_temphyst,
+ NULL, 7);
+
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_crit_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 9);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_fault, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 10);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_min_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 11);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_max_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 12);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_emergency_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 14);
+
+static struct attribute *lm90_temp3_attributes[] = {
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_input.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_min.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_max.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_crit.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_crit_hyst.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_emergency.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_emergency_hyst.dev_attr.attr,
+
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_fault.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_min_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_max_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_crit_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_emergency_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
+ NULL
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group lm90_temp3_group = {
+ .attrs = lm90_temp3_attributes,
+};
+
/* pec used for ADM1032 only */
static ssize_t show_pec(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *dummy,
char *buf)
@@ -720,6 +808,30 @@ static int lm90_read_reg(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 *value)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * client->update_lock must be held when calling this function (unless we are
+ * in detection or initialization steps), and while a remote channel other
+ * than channel 0 is selected. Also, calling code must make sure to re-select
+ * external channel 0 before releasing the lock. This is necessary because
+ * various registers have different meanings as a result of selecting a
+ * non-default remote channel.
+ */
+static inline void lm90_select_remote_channel(struct i2c_client *client,
+ struct lm90_data *data,
+ int channel)
+{
+ u8 config;
+
+ if (data->kind = max6696) {
+ lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_CONFIG1, &config);
+ config &= ~0x08;
+ if (channel)
+ config |= 0x08;
+ i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_W_CONFIG1,
+ config);
+ }
+}
+
/* Return 0 if detection is successful, -ENODEV otherwise */
static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client,
struct i2c_board_info *info)
@@ -794,6 +906,23 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client,
}
} else
if (man_id = 0x4D) { /* Maxim */
+ int reg_emerg, reg_emerg2, reg_status2;
+
+ /*
+ * We read MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG twice, and re-read
+ * LM90_REG_R_MAN_ID in between. If MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG
+ * exists, both readings will reflect the same value. Otherwise,
+ * the readings will be different.
+ */
+ if ((reg_emerg = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client,
+ MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG)) < 0
+ || i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client, LM90_REG_R_MAN_ID) < 0
+ || (reg_emerg2 = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client,
+ MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG)) < 0
+ || (reg_status2 = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client,
+ MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2)) < 0)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
/*
* The MAX6657, MAX6658 and MAX6659 do NOT have a chip_id
* register. Reading from that address will return the last
@@ -817,6 +946,24 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client,
name = "max6659";
} else
/*
+ * Even though MAX6695 and MAX6696 do not have a chip ID
+ * register, reading it returns 0x01. Bit 4 of the config1
+ * register is unused and should return zero when read. Bit 0 of
+ * the status2 register is unused and should return zero when
+ * read.
+ *
+ * MAX6695 and MAX6696 have an additional set of temperature
+ * limit registers. We can detect those chips by checking if
+ * one of those registers exists.
+ */
+ if (chip_id = 0x01
+ && (reg_config1 & 0x10) = 0x00
+ && (reg_status2 & 0x01) = 0x00
+ && reg_emerg = reg_emerg2
+ && reg_convrate <= 0x07) {
+ name = "max6696";
+ } else
+ /*
* The chip_id register of the MAX6680 and MAX6681 holds the
* revision of the chip. The lowest bit of the config1 register
* is unused and should return zero when read, so should the
@@ -861,6 +1008,11 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client,
static void lm90_remove_files(struct i2c_client *client, struct lm90_data *data)
{
+ if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_TEMP3)
+ sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm90_temp3_group);
+ if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM)
+ sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj,
+ &lm90_emergency_alarm_group);
if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY)
sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj,
&lm90_emergency_group);
@@ -901,6 +1053,9 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *new_client,
case lm86:
data->alert_alarms = 0x7b;
break;
+ case max6696:
+ data->alert_alarms = 0x187c;
+ break;
default:
data->alert_alarms = 0x7c;
break;
@@ -908,20 +1063,24 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *new_client,
/* Set chip capabilities */
if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6659
- && data->kind != max6646)
+ && data->kind != max6646 && data->kind != max6696)
data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_OFFSET;
if (data->kind = max6657 || data->kind = max6659
- || data->kind = max6646)
+ || data->kind = max6646 || data->kind = max6696)
data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT;
if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6659
- && data->kind != max6646 && data->kind != max6680)
+ && data->kind != max6646 && data->kind != max6680
+ && data->kind != max6696)
data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT;
- if (data->kind = max6659)
+ if (data->kind = max6659 || data->kind = max6696)
data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY;
+ if (data->kind = max6696)
+ data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM | LM90_HAVE_TEMP3;
+
/* Initialize the LM90 chip */
lm90_init_client(new_client);
@@ -946,6 +1105,18 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *new_client,
if (err)
goto exit_remove_files;
}
+ if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM) {
+ err = sysfs_create_group(&new_client->dev.kobj,
+ &lm90_emergency_alarm_group);
+ if (err)
+ goto exit_remove_files;
+ }
+ if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_TEMP3) {
+ err = sysfs_create_group(&new_client->dev.kobj,
+ &lm90_temp3_group);
+ if (err)
+ goto exit_remove_files;
+ }
data->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(&new_client->dev);
if (IS_ERR(data->hwmon_dev)) {
@@ -993,6 +1164,12 @@ static void lm90_init_client(struct i2c_client *client)
if (data->kind = max6680)
config |= 0x18;
+ /*
+ * Select external channel 0 for max6695/96
+ */
+ if (data->kind = max6696)
+ config &= ~0x08;
+
config &= 0xBF; /* run */
if (config != data->config_orig) /* Only write if changed */
i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_W_CONFIG1, config);
@@ -1016,10 +1193,14 @@ static int lm90_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
static void lm90_alert(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned int flag)
{
struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
- u8 config, alarms;
+ u8 config, alarms, alarms2 = 0;
lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
- if ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0) {
+
+ if (data->kind = max6696)
+ lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &alarms2);
+
+ if ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0 && (alarms2 & 0xfe) = 0) {
dev_info(&client->dev, "Everything OK\n");
} else {
if (alarms & 0x61)
@@ -1032,6 +1213,10 @@ static void lm90_alert(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned int flag)
dev_warn(&client->dev,
"temp%d diode open, please check!\n", 2);
+ if (alarms2 & 0x18)
+ dev_warn(&client->dev,
+ "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 3);
+
/* Disable ALERT# output, because these chips don't implement
SMBus alert correctly; they should only hold the alert line
low briefly. */
@@ -1087,6 +1272,7 @@ static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev)
if (time_after(jiffies, data->last_updated + HZ / 2 + HZ / 10)
|| !data->valid) {
u8 h, l;
+ u8 alarms;
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Updating lm90 data.\n");
lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_LOCAL_LOW, &data->temp8[0]);
@@ -1135,7 +1321,27 @@ static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev)
lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
&data->temp8[5]);
}
- lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &data->alarms);
+ lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
+ data->alarms = alarms; /* save as 16 bit value */
+
+ if (data->kind = max6696) {
+ lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 1);
+ lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_CRIT,
+ &data->temp8[6]);
+ lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
+ &data->temp8[7]);
+ lm90_read16(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPH,
+ LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPL, &data->temp11[5]);
+ if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h))
+ data->temp11[6] = h << 8;
+ if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h))
+ data->temp11[7] = h << 8;
+ lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
+
+ if (!lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2,
+ &alarms))
+ data->alarms |= alarms << 8;
+ }
/* Re-enable ALERT# output if it was originally enabled and
* relevant alarms are all clear */
--
1.7.0.87.g0901d
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for
2010-09-16 1:52 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for max6695 Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-10-06 16:19 ` Jean Delvare
2010-10-06 17:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-10-06 18:50 ` Jean Delvare
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-10-06 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Guenter,
Sorry for being a little slow, but...
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:52:30 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
> ---
> Documentation/hwmon/lm90 | 17 +++
> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 4 +-
> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> (...)
> @@ -154,6 +160,8 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
> #define LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT (1 << 2) /* extended local temperature */
> #define LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT (1 << 3) /* extended remote limit */
> #define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY (1 << 4) /* 3rd upper (emergency) limit */
> +#define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM (1 << 5)/* emergency alarm */
> +#define LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 (1 << 6) /* 3rd temperature sensor */
>
> /*
> * Functions declaration
> (...)
> @@ -1135,7 +1321,27 @@ static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev)
> lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
> &data->temp8[5]);
> }
> - lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &data->alarms);
> + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
> + data->alarms = alarms; /* save as 16 bit value */
> +
> + if (data->kind = max6696) {
Wouldn't this be better written:
if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_TEMP3) {
> + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 1);
> + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_CRIT,
> + &data->temp8[6]);
> + lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
> + &data->temp8[7]);
> + lm90_read16(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPH,
> + LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPL, &data->temp11[5]);
> + if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h))
> + data->temp11[6] = h << 8;
> + if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h))
> + data->temp11[7] = h << 8;
> + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
> +
and:
if (data->flags & (LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 | LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM))
> + if (!lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2,
> + &alarms))
> + data->alarms |= alarms << 8;
> + }
so that adding support for more chips with these features in the future
is easier?
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for
2010-09-16 1:52 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for max6695 Guenter Roeck
2010-10-06 16:19 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for Jean Delvare
@ 2010-10-06 17:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-10-06 18:50 ` Jean Delvare
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-10-06 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Jean,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:19:31PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Sorry for being a little slow, but...
>
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:52:30 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/hwmon/lm90 | 17 +++
> > drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 4 +-
> > drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > (...)
> > @@ -154,6 +160,8 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
> > #define LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT (1 << 2) /* extended local temperature */
> > #define LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT (1 << 3) /* extended remote limit */
> > #define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY (1 << 4) /* 3rd upper (emergency) limit */
> > +#define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM (1 << 5)/* emergency alarm */
> > +#define LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 (1 << 6) /* 3rd temperature sensor */
> >
> > /*
> > * Functions declaration
> > (...)
> > @@ -1135,7 +1321,27 @@ static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev)
> > lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
> > &data->temp8[5]);
> > }
> > - lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &data->alarms);
> > + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
> > + data->alarms = alarms; /* save as 16 bit value */
> > +
> > + if (data->kind = max6696) {
>
> Wouldn't this be better written:
>
> if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_TEMP3) {
>
> > + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 1);
> > + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_CRIT,
> > + &data->temp8[6]);
> > + lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
> > + &data->temp8[7]);
> > + lm90_read16(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPH,
> > + LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPL, &data->temp11[5]);
> > + if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h))
> > + data->temp11[6] = h << 8;
> > + if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h))
> > + data->temp11[7] = h << 8;
> > + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
> > +
>
> and:
>
> if (data->flags & (LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 | LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM))
>
Possibly. I didn't do it on purpose, though, since it is not clear yet if the registers
used to access those sensors on future chips will be the same or completely different.
I figured it is better to play safe and implement the actual register accesses
by checking ->kind instead of using the capability flags.
Later on it might end up as
if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_TEMP3) {
switch (data->kind) {
case max6696:
...
break;
case newchip:
...
break;
}
}
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for
2010-09-16 1:52 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for max6695 Guenter Roeck
2010-10-06 16:19 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for Jean Delvare
2010-10-06 17:40 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-10-06 18:50 ` Jean Delvare
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-10-06 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:19:31PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > Sorry for being a little slow, but...
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:52:30 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/hwmon/lm90 | 17 +++
> > > drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 4 +-
> > > drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 3 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > (...)
> > > @@ -154,6 +160,8 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
> > > #define LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT (1 << 2) /* extended local temperature */
> > > #define LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT (1 << 3) /* extended remote limit */
> > > #define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY (1 << 4) /* 3rd upper (emergency) limit */
> > > +#define LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM (1 << 5)/* emergency alarm */
> > > +#define LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 (1 << 6) /* 3rd temperature sensor */
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Functions declaration
> > > (...)
> > > @@ -1135,7 +1321,27 @@ static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev)
> > > lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
> > > &data->temp8[5]);
> > > }
> > > - lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &data->alarms);
> > > + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
> > > + data->alarms = alarms; /* save as 16 bit value */
> > > +
> > > + if (data->kind = max6696) {
> >
> > Wouldn't this be better written:
> >
> > if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_TEMP3) {
> >
> > > + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 1);
> > > + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_CRIT,
> > > + &data->temp8[6]);
> > > + lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6659_REG_R_REMOTE_EMERG,
> > > + &data->temp8[7]);
> > > + lm90_read16(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPH,
> > > + LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_TEMPL, &data->temp11[5]);
> > > + if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h))
> > > + data->temp11[6] = h << 8;
> > > + if (!lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h))
> > > + data->temp11[7] = h << 8;
> > > + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
> > > +
> >
> > and:
> >
> > if (data->flags & (LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 | LM90_HAVE_EMERGENCY_ALARM))
> >
> Possibly. I didn't do it on purpose, though, since it is not clear yet if the registers
> used to access those sensors on future chips will be the same or completely different.
> I figured it is better to play safe and implement the actual register accesses
> by checking ->kind instead of using the capability flags.
>
> Later on it might end up as
>
> if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_TEMP3) {
> switch (data->kind) {
> case max6696:
> ...
> break;
> case newchip:
> ...
> break;
> }
> }
>
Right, that makes sense. Sorry for the noise.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-06 18:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-16 1:52 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for max6695 Guenter Roeck
2010-10-06 16:19 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 7/7] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for Jean Delvare
2010-10-06 17:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-10-06 18:50 ` Jean Delvare
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.