All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
	"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
	"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	"Cahill, Ben M" <ben.m.cahill@intel.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-2.6 or stable] iwlwifi: return error when fail to start scanning
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:32:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101006193245.698957cc@schatten.dmk.lab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286381578.12594.18.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:12:58 -0700
"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Gruszka,
> 
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:04 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > This is stable friendly backport of wireless-testing commit
> > 3eecce527c7434dfd16517ce08b49632c8a26717 "iwlwifi: unify scan start
> > checks". Wireless-testing version include also a lot of cleanups.
> > 
> > On error case in {iwl3945,iwlagn}_request_scan we queue abort_scan work,
> > which in a fact do nothing, so we never complete the scan. Thats gives
> > "WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work" and stopped
> > network connection until reload iwlwifi modules. Return of -EIO, and
> > stopping queuing any work is a fix.
> > 
> > Note there are still many cases when we can get: 
> > 
> > WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work  
> > WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:266 ieee80211_scan_completed
> > WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_complete
> > 
> > which are not fixed. Unfortunately does not exist single, small fix
> > for that problems, and we probably will see some more bug reports
> > with scan warnings. As solution we rewrite iwl-scan.c code to avoid
> > all possible race conditions. That quite big patch set is queued
> > for 2.6.37 .
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Patch is intended for wireless-2.6, or in case when it does not
> > make 2.6.36 release, for -stable 2.6.36.y 
> > 
> 
> Is this the replacement for Mickler's patch?
> 
> Thanks
> Wey
> 

This is on top of current mainline, as far as I see. (And it replaces
the patch I sent few hours ago)

Regards,
Flo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-06 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-05  6:43 Fw: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be aborted Florian Mickler
2010-10-05  6:43 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05  8:57 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-05  8:57   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-05 10:12   ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 10:43     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-05 10:43       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-05 22:29       ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 22:29         ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 22:21   ` [PATCH] iwlwifi: fix iwlwifi scanning corner cases Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 22:21     ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-06  9:02     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06  9:02       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06 16:04       ` [PATCH wireless-2.6 or stable] iwlwifi: return error when fail to start scanning Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06 16:04         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06 16:12         ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-06 17:32           ` Florian Mickler [this message]
2010-10-06 17:45         ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-06 17:45           ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-06 17:48           ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-06 20:01         ` John W. Linville
2010-10-06 20:01           ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101006193245.698957cc@schatten.dmk.lab \
    --to=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=ben.m.cahill@intel.com \
    --cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.