From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"Cahill, Ben M" <ben.m.cahill@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be aborted
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101005085717.GA18012@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101005084305.52a31ed4@schatten.dmk.lab>
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:43:05AM +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> commit e7ee762cf074b0fd8eec483d0cef8fdbf0d04b81
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:22 -0700, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > iwl3945's scan_completed calls into the mac80211 stack which triggers a
> > warn on if there is no scan outstanding.
> >
> > This can be avoided by not calling scan_completed but abort_scan in
> > iwl3945_request_scan in the done: branch of the function which is used
> > as an error out.
> >
> > The done: branch seems to be an error-out branch, as, for example, if
> > iwl_is_ready(priv) returns false the done: branch is executed.
> >
> > NOTE:
> > I'm not familiar with the driver at all.
> > I just quickly scanned as a reaction to
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722
> >
> > the users of scan_completed in the iwl3945 driver and noted the odd
> > discrepancy between the comment above this instance and the comment in
> > mac80211 scan_completed function.
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
> Acked-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
> > ---
> go into wireless-2.6 and stable only, scan fix already in
> wireless-next-2.6
>
> Thanks
> Wey
>
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > index 9dd9e64..8fd00a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > @@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ void iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> > clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
> > clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> > /* inform mac80211 scan aborted */
> > - queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);
> > + queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->abort_scan);
Unfortunately this patch is not right thing to do. If you look at
abort_scan work, it do nothing if STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING bit is not set.
That's wrong because we have to complete scan (with abort == true).
If STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING will be set, abort_work will send scan cancel
commands to hardware what is wrong if scan was not started yet.
What we can eventually do, except apply iwl-scan rewrite from
wireless-testing, is something like that:
iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
/* inform mac80211 scan aborted */
set_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);
ieee80211_scan_completed
if (!internal) {
bool aborted = test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
ieee80211_scan_completed(priv->hw, aborted);
}
However, I do not think we should go with that to -stable (below
2.6.36). IIRC warnings showed up in current 2.6.36-rc, because of
some other changes in the code.
Stanislaw
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Florian Mickler <florian-sVu6HhrpSfRAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
"linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Guy,
Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Chatre,
Reinette"
<reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Intel Linux Wireless
<ilw-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
"John W. Linville"
<linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Berg,
Johannes" <johannes.berg-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Cahill,
Ben M" <ben.m.cahill-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be aborted
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101005085717.GA18012@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101005084305.52a31ed4-mGsOIKOveelVRbCss4o9kg@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:43:05AM +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> commit e7ee762cf074b0fd8eec483d0cef8fdbf0d04b81
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:22 -0700, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > iwl3945's scan_completed calls into the mac80211 stack which triggers a
> > warn on if there is no scan outstanding.
> >
> > This can be avoided by not calling scan_completed but abort_scan in
> > iwl3945_request_scan in the done: branch of the function which is used
> > as an error out.
> >
> > The done: branch seems to be an error-out branch, as, for example, if
> > iwl_is_ready(priv) returns false the done: branch is executed.
> >
> > NOTE:
> > I'm not familiar with the driver at all.
> > I just quickly scanned as a reaction to
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722
> >
> > the users of scan_completed in the iwl3945 driver and noted the odd
> > discrepancy between the comment above this instance and the comment in
> > mac80211 scan_completed function.
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian-sVu6HhrpSfRAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> go into wireless-2.6 and stable only, scan fix already in
> wireless-next-2.6
>
> Thanks
> Wey
>
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > index 9dd9e64..8fd00a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > @@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ void iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> > clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
> > clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> > /* inform mac80211 scan aborted */
> > - queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);
> > + queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->abort_scan);
Unfortunately this patch is not right thing to do. If you look at
abort_scan work, it do nothing if STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING bit is not set.
That's wrong because we have to complete scan (with abort == true).
If STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING will be set, abort_work will send scan cancel
commands to hardware what is wrong if scan was not started yet.
What we can eventually do, except apply iwl-scan rewrite from
wireless-testing, is something like that:
iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
/* inform mac80211 scan aborted */
set_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);
ieee80211_scan_completed
if (!internal) {
bool aborted = test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
ieee80211_scan_completed(priv->hw, aborted);
}
However, I do not think we should go with that to -stable (below
2.6.36). IIRC warnings showed up in current 2.6.36-rc, because of
some other changes in the code.
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-05 6:43 Fw: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be aborted Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 6:43 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 8:57 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2010-10-05 8:57 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-05 10:12 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 10:43 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-05 10:43 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-05 22:29 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 22:29 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 22:21 ` [PATCH] iwlwifi: fix iwlwifi scanning corner cases Florian Mickler
2010-10-05 22:21 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-06 9:02 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06 9:02 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06 16:04 ` [PATCH wireless-2.6 or stable] iwlwifi: return error when fail to start scanning Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06 16:04 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-06 16:12 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-06 17:32 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-06 17:45 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-06 17:45 ` Florian Mickler
2010-10-06 17:48 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-06 20:01 ` John W. Linville
2010-10-06 20:01 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101005085717.GA18012@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=ben.m.cahill@intel.com \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.