From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net>
To: Cong Meng <mcpacino@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: introduce dm-snap-mv
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:31:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010071431.14937.phillips@phunq.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101006083150.GA15758@zhongling>
Hi Meng,
The patch looks sensible, however the question is: why do you want to
do this? Would it not be better to generalize your metadata format to
accomodate the device's native blocksize?
Regards,
Daniel
> a kernel patch
> --------------
> Now, dm-snap-mv highly depends on a kernel patch below, which make __getblk()
> can get a 4K buffer head while block size of the disk is NOT 4K.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mcpacino@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 3e7dca2..f7f9d33 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1051,10 +1051,7 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
> pgoff_t index;
> int sizebits;
>
> - sizebits = -1;
> - do {
> - sizebits++;
> - } while ((size << sizebits) < PAGE_SIZE);
> + sizebits = PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits;
>
> index = block >> sizebits;
>
> @@ -2924,7 +2921,7 @@ int submit_bh(int rw, struct buffer_head * bh)
> */
> bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, 1);
>
> - bio->bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
> + bio->bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr << (bh->b_bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits - 9);
> bio->bi_bdev = bh->b_bdev;
> bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_page = bh->b_page;
> bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = bh->b_size;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net>
To: Cong Meng <mcpacino@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: introduce dm-snap-mv
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:31:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010071431.14937.phillips@phunq.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101006083150.GA15758@zhongling>
Hi Meng,
The patch looks sensible, however the question is: why do you want to
do this? Would it not be better to generalize your metadata format to
accomodate the device's native blocksize?
Regards,
Daniel
> a kernel patch
> --------------
> Now, dm-snap-mv highly depends on a kernel patch below, which make __getblk()
> can get a 4K buffer head while block size of the disk is NOT 4K.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mcpacino@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 3e7dca2..f7f9d33 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1051,10 +1051,7 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
> pgoff_t index;
> int sizebits;
>
> - sizebits = -1;
> - do {
> - sizebits++;
> - } while ((size << sizebits) < PAGE_SIZE);
> + sizebits = PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits;
>
> index = block >> sizebits;
>
> @@ -2924,7 +2921,7 @@ int submit_bh(int rw, struct buffer_head * bh)
> */
> bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, 1);
>
> - bio->bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
> + bio->bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr << (bh->b_bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits - 9);
> bio->bi_bdev = bh->b_bdev;
> bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_page = bh->b_page;
> bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = bh->b_size;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-06 8:31 introduce dm-snap-mv Cong Meng
2010-10-06 8:31 ` Cong Meng
2010-10-06 8:31 ` Cong Meng
2010-10-07 21:31 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2010-10-07 21:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2010-10-08 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 9:14 ` McPacino
2010-10-08 9:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 9:28 ` McPacino
2010-10-08 13:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2010-10-13 16:45 ` McPacino
2010-10-13 16:45 ` McPacino
2010-10-08 9:01 ` McPacino
2010-10-19 19:58 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2010-11-06 3:24 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010071431.14937.phillips@phunq.net \
--to=phillips@phunq.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcpacino@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.