From: "Gerhard Pircher" <gerhard_pircher@gmx.net>
To: pacman@kosh.dhis.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Pegasos i8042 broken again
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:26:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010122602.74300@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286696147.2463.499.camel@pasglop>
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 20:37 -0500, pacman@kosh.dhis.org wrote:
> Pegasos has no keyboard again. I blame commit
> 540c6c392f01887dcc96bef0a41e63e6c1334f01, which tries to find i8042 IRQs
> inthe device-tree but doesn't fall back to the old hardcoded 1 and 12 in
> all failure cases.
>
> Specifically, the case where the device-tree contains nothing matching
> pnpPNP,303 or pnpPNP,f03 doesn't seem to be handled well. It sort of
> falls through to the old code, but leaves the IRQs set to 0.
>
> The last time something like this happened, I submitted a patch:
> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-July/039988.html
> which got committed, but afterward I was scolded for working around a
> bug instead of fixing it in nvramrc.
>
> This time I just won't send my workaround patch, at least until it's
> decided that the kernel should be made to understand the device-tree as
> is.
> If it's decided instead that the firmware should be patched... well I
> just don't feel comfortable inventing my own patch for nvramrc, since
> it's written in a language I don't know and presumably could brick the
> machine if I get it wrong. Also I'm not even sure what the kernel is
> expecting to find there.
Is this a Pegasos 1 or Pegasos 2? I'm just curious, because some Pegasos 1
users told me that newer Linux kernels don't even boot on their machines.
regards,
Gerhard
--
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-10 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-10 1:37 Pegasos i8042 broken again pacman
2010-10-10 7:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-10 12:26 ` Gerhard Pircher [this message]
2010-10-10 17:32 ` pacman
2011-04-04 22:26 ` Gabriel Paubert
2011-04-04 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-04-04 22:49 ` Gabriel Paubert
2011-04-04 23:02 ` pacman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101010122602.74300@gmx.net \
--to=gerhard_pircher@gmx.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=pacman@kosh.dhis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.