From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Ian Lartey <ian@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Dimitris Papastamos <dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8804: fix error handling code
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:15:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101011121555.GA32652@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011120014.GJ9231@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 13:00 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:29:04PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > kzalloc() returns NULL on error, not ERR_PTR().
> > Also wm8804_modinit() didn't called i2c_del_driver() if
> > spi_register_driver() failed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
>
> Please try to follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches - in particular,
> you should always split unrelated changes into separate patches. In
> this case your I2C and kzalloc() changes have nothing to do with each
> other and so should be in separate patches,
Agreed, thanks.
> and the kzalloc() changes
> were already applied from a patch by someone else.
Yes, it was sent by Dan just one day before my patch ;)
> For the registration
> changes...
> > @@ -804,6 +804,7 @@ static int __init wm8804_modinit(void)
> > if (ret) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to register wm8804 I2C driver: %d\n",
> > ret);
> > + goto err;
> > }
> > #endif
> > #if defined(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER)
>
> ...it's not clear to me that this change is an improvement - it'll make
> the driver more fragile in the face of errors, I don't see a benefit in
> refusing to register the variant for one bus if the other fails?
I tried to implement your variant with depca driver in past, but it was
rejected by David Miller:
http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2010/07/12/9
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Ian Lartey <ian@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Dimitris Papastamos <dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8804: fix error handling code
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:15:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101011121555.GA32652@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011120014.GJ9231@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 13:00 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:29:04PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > kzalloc() returns NULL on error, not ERR_PTR().
> > Also wm8804_modinit() didn't called i2c_del_driver() if
> > spi_register_driver() failed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
>
> Please try to follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches - in particular,
> you should always split unrelated changes into separate patches. In
> this case your I2C and kzalloc() changes have nothing to do with each
> other and so should be in separate patches,
Agreed, thanks.
> and the kzalloc() changes
> were already applied from a patch by someone else.
Yes, it was sent by Dan just one day before my patch ;)
> For the registration
> changes...
> > @@ -804,6 +804,7 @@ static int __init wm8804_modinit(void)
> > if (ret) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to register wm8804 I2C driver: %d\n",
> > ret);
> > + goto err;
> > }
> > #endif
> > #if defined(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER)
>
> ...it's not clear to me that this change is an improvement - it'll make
> the driver more fragile in the face of errors, I don't see a benefit in
> refusing to register the variant for one bus if the other fails?
I tried to implement your variant with depca driver in past, but it was
rejected by David Miller:
http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2010/07/12/9
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-10 17:29 [PATCH] ASoC: wm8804: fix error handling code Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-10-10 17:29 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-10-11 12:00 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:00 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:00 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:15 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2010-10-11 12:15 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-10-11 12:36 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:36 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:36 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:50 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-10-11 12:50 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-10-11 12:59 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:59 ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 12:59 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101011121555.GA32652@albatros \
--to=segooon@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=ian@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.