From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: omap1: devices: need to return with a value
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:31:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101105213106.GV9264@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019080150.GC11713@pengutronix.de>
* Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> [101019 00:53]:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:30:54AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Get rid of the following warning:
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c: In function 'omap_init_wdt':
> > arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c:298: warning: 'return' with
> > no value, in function returning non-void
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c
> > index 63d68cf..a037aba 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c
> > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static struct platform_device omap_wdt_device = {
> > static int __init omap_init_wdt(void)
> > {
> > if (!cpu_is_omap16xx())
> > - return;
> > + return -ENODEV;
> >
> > platform_device_register(&omap_wdt_device);
> > return 0;
> It's unrelated to this patch, but using
>
> return platform_device_register(&omap_wdt_device);
>
> would be a bit cleaner.
Felipe, care to update this one?
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm: omap1: devices: need to return with a value
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:31:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101105213106.GV9264@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019080150.GC11713@pengutronix.de>
* Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> [101019 00:53]:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:30:54AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Get rid of the following warning:
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c: In function 'omap_init_wdt':
> > arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c:298: warning: 'return' with
> > no value, in function returning non-void
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c
> > index 63d68cf..a037aba 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c
> > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static struct platform_device omap_wdt_device = {
> > static int __init omap_init_wdt(void)
> > {
> > if (!cpu_is_omap16xx())
> > - return;
> > + return -ENODEV;
> >
> > platform_device_register(&omap_wdt_device);
> > return 0;
> It's unrelated to this patch, but using
>
> return platform_device_register(&omap_wdt_device);
>
> would be a bit cleaner.
Felipe, care to update this one?
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-05 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 7:30 [PATCH 0/2] Trivial series Felipe Balbi
2010-10-19 7:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-10-19 7:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: omap1: devices: need to return with a value Felipe Balbi
2010-10-19 7:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-10-19 8:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-10-19 8:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-05 21:31 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2010-11-05 21:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-08 6:48 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2010-11-08 6:48 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-10-19 7:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap1: remove unused variables Felipe Balbi
2010-10-19 7:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-05 16:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-05 16:47 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101105213106.GV9264@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.