From: Yann Dirson <dirson@bertin.fr>
To: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Cc: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Using gitrevisions :/search style with other operators
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:24:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109102428.5ba8dc13@chalon.bertin.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13A8F1B3-39B0-4D11-8763-9C458F75487D@sb.org>
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:06:47 -0800
Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> > Kevin wrote:
> >> Junio wrote:
> >>> $ git log 'HEAD..:( :/Merge branch 'kb/blame-author-email' )^2'
> > [...]
> >>
> >> Interesting idea. It certainly solves the problem of being able to
> >> embed it within other operations (though you do then have to worry
> >> about escaping any embedded close-parens in the search), though it
> >> does mean my suggestion for being able to select the 2nd (or nth)
> >> match won't work.
> >
> > Syntax like origin/pu^{/Merge 'kb/blame-author-email'}2 would be
> > somewhat consistent with the commit^2 case, and would seem
> > unambiguous as well - a bit weird, though.
>
> This violates the idea that once you reach the end of a ^{} structure,
> it resolves to a commit that can then be modified by subsequent
> operations.
OK, that's kinda related to the "looks weird" issue.
Another idea: origin/pu^{:2/Merge 'kb/blame-author-email'}
Since the foo^{objecttype} syntax would not care for a count, it is not
a problem, and it keeps provision for using a count with future
operators. OTOH, it could be a problem if we extend foo^{bar} to
accept "bar" for other things than object types.
--
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 7:30 [RFC] Using gitrevisions :/search style with other operators Yann Dirson
2010-11-09 8:06 ` Kevin Ballard
2010-11-09 9:24 ` Yann Dirson [this message]
2010-11-10 0:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-11-10 0:33 ` Kevin Ballard
2010-11-10 7:32 ` Yann Dirson
2010-11-10 7:46 ` Kevin Ballard
2010-11-10 7:46 ` Yann Dirson
2010-11-10 15:26 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-11-10 16:37 ` [PATCH] get_sha1: support relative path "<obj>:<sth>" syntax Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-11-10 17:17 ` Matthieu Moy
2010-11-10 17:47 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-11-11 13:18 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-11-10 19:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-11-11 1:30 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-12-09 21:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-09 21:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-10 1:35 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-11-10 17:23 ` [RFC] Using gitrevisions :/search style with other operators Junio C Hamano
2010-11-10 18:19 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-11-09 16:10 ` Jeff King
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-05 22:38 Kevin Ballard
2010-11-08 19:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-11-08 22:11 ` Kevin Ballard
2010-11-09 5:16 ` Jeff King
2010-11-09 15:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-11-09 16:08 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109102428.5ba8dc13@chalon.bertin.fr \
--to=dirson@bertin.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kevin@sb.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.