From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
esandeen@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clear PageError bit in msync & fsync
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:07:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109210715.GJ3099@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD9A209.6070807@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:33:29PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> There are essentially two possibilities:
> 1) the VM can potentially be filled up with uncleanable dirty pages, or
> 2) pages that hit an IO error are left in a clean state, so they can
> be reclaimed under memory pressure
>
> Alternative 1 could cause the entire system to deadlock, while
> option 2 puts the onus on userland apps to rewrite the data
> from a failed msync/fsync.
>
> Currently the VM has behaviour #2 which is preserved with my
> patch.
>
> The only difference with my patch is, we won't keep returning
> -EIO on subsequent, error free, msync or fsync calls to files
> that had an IO error at some previous point in the past.
Do we guarantee that the application will get EIO at least once? I
thought there were issues where the error bit could get lost if the
page writeback was triggered by sync() run by a third-party
application.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 16:44 [PATCH] clear PageError bit in msync & fsync Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 18:09 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-11-09 19:21 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 19:33 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:07 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2010-11-09 21:15 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-12 4:36 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 15:52 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-12 17:04 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:44 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-11 16:31 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-09 21:21 ` Zan Lynx
2010-11-09 21:24 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-12 20:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-12 21:36 ` Jeff Layton
2010-11-09 21:39 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109210715.GJ3099@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.